Wednesday, May 24, 2017

Open Letter to the Bishops of Cameroon: Rise up your Excellencies and Liberate this Country from Political Repression by Mbiydzenyuy WANTANGWA



An Open Letter to the President And the National Episcopal Conference of Cameroon, Concerning their Reaction and Resolutions on the Present Crisis in the Anglophone Regions of Cameroon and their present duty to Liberate Cameroon from Political Repression.


Summary Note:
Another open letter, this time from an ex-priest, challenges the President and the National Episcopal Conference of Cameroon into deep reflection; Vehemently Condemns Government’s malicious strategies of Divisiveness, Mediocrity, Incompetence and the Machiavellian Handling of the “Anglophone Crisis”. He Further Expresses the Urgency of Liberation from Political Repression in Cameroon and Demands that the Bishops of Cameroon, should, as a matter of urgency, like their confreres in the Democratic Republic of Congo and elsewhere, take up their responsibilities and divine mandate, in bringing the regime that is in power in Cameroon to some measure of sanity in their governance and in fearlessly being the voice of the voiceless rather than the voice of the oppressor.


Your Excellencies,
“…the urgency of now, (cf. Barack Obama) is the urgency of liberation from political repression in Cameroon… and the Catholic Church must immediately, without delay and without fear or favour, take a stand and embark on the project of freedom of the people who live in socio-economic and political slavery in Cameroon. The freshly spilled blood of Mgr. Jean Marie Benoit Bala, and the blood of countless clergy, religious and innocent Cameroonians cries out throughout the land, and rest assured that I am not going to recite some niceties to you here, I challenge you to do something urgent for this country. I challenged you, in the name of God the Most High, rise up as one voice irrespective of your affiliations and privileges you enjoy from this murderous regime, which under Paul Biya, your Catholic Christian, has carried out the highest hideous crimes against humanity. Rise up, as one powerful and united force irrespective of your previous commitments, engagements and attachments or even admiration or involvement of whatever is left of this regime that is committing crimes with impunity and insanity, knowing that you have both the people and God to judge your complacency. The voice of the Catholic Church is the highest moral voice in the world and this cannot be silenced by a merciless, malicious, Machiavellian dictatorship and demagogic regime before your very eyes. This is what awaits you and this is the task you must do in the name of God your maker to whom you vowed fidelity and to whom you must render an account of your stewardship…”
Accept my humble greetings and blessings of the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ. Truly He is risen from the dead. Alleluia. Your excellency, I did not write to you until now due to a few reasons, namely, that I will not normally rise up in the crowd and shout at the same time with them if I want to be heard loud and clear, and then secondly, I wanted you to be an honest witness to two events in this country, first, your tour of the Anglophone dioceses, for which you must surely presently be leaking your wounds over the results on the field as you witnessed the insistence and intransigence of government administrators trying all the time to syphon the purpose of your mission to suit their already existing agendas, and secondly, the unfortunate celebrations of the demagogic political agendas directly linking to the so-called national unity or national integration to which your slogan in the message to the people referred. More so, the death of yet another Bishop, Mgr. Jean Marie Benoit Bala, has so infuriated as it has deeply saddened my soul so much so that I cannot hold back my impressions of the present status quo. And now with the rate at which things are terribly evolving in this country, if I remain silent, I should be held accountable for complicity with the deep-seated evil that thrives in this county. The reign of the devil, has been enthroned and institutionalized in Cameroon and is raking havoc to the sons and daughters of this land with unrivalled ferocity and malignity and the powers that be are to be held responsible. So, I must speak in the hope that you will not continue to watch the Church and her leaders not even the citizens of this country whose lives are being extinguished on a daily basis by a regime that smacks of a veritable satanic kingdom in action. Let me take the liberty to freely revisit the recent letter of the president of the National Episcopal Conference and basing on its utterances, I will take the freedom to invite you to come to terms with the magnitude of the problem in this country and take immediate action.
Let me begin by inviting you to read through the following disturbing and preoccupying passage which appeared on Social Media (Facebook, ID of the person withheld) on the 6th of May 2017 concerning your knowledge or the lack of it, of the situation on ground in the North West and South West regions. It reads:
“CLAP FOR YOURSELF BISHOP KLEDA. You did not know that schools in Southern Cameroons were shut down. You did not know that we had Ghost Towns. You did not know that we were MARGINALIZED. You did not know that there was an Anglophone problem. You did not know that our leaders Mancho Bibixy FONTEM, BALLA, PENN AND 100+ WERE ABDUCTED in the dark and carted to Kondengui. You did not know that countless Southern Cameroonians have been buried in a mass grave at SOA. You did not know that ROMEO and countless others have been gunned down in our streets for the past months and in the last 56 years. You did not know that our lawyers and teachers have been on strike for close to a year and with no dime in their pockets and have been publicly beaten and disgraced. What about our innocent university students who were raped and dragged in the mud for protesting innocently. Did you know that too? I bet you “didn’t”. You collected 50m (allegedly) and came to Southern Cameroons without knowing ALL OF THE ABOVE???? MAN OF GOD, MY QUESTION TO YOU IS THIS: WHAT WERE YOU SENT TO DO SINCE YOU KNEW NOTHING OF THE ABOVE? GOD IS WATCHING YOU…”

INTRODUCTION
You will bear with me for single-handedly writing to you because I am besieged by a great measure of mixed feelings and disquiet as I read through your letter addressed to “the people of God in Cameroon” and “to all persons of good will” which unfortunately carried a controversial caption: “One People, One Nation”.  I must admit that as I read through the title of your “Message of the Bishops of Cameroon, Concerning the situation in the North West and South West Regions of Cameroon”, I was (before going into the details of the message), elated with the nostalgic expectation to hear the usual solid stance of our religious leaders. My immediate expectations were to hear much better things after the manner of the memorandum of the Bishops of the Ecclesiastical Province of Bamenda, (BAPEC). Indeed, it is a good thing for Bishops to write to their Christians, and to “all persons of good will”, and when necessary, to the people of a country, and even to the authorities that be, especially when grave danger is imminent.  When the Bishops speak, as the tradition has always been, when the Episcopal Conference was still the Episcopal Conference, it is obligatory for the Christians to take them for their word because they speak on behalf of God and in persona Christi . Even those who do not believe in the institutional church or even in religion at all, have often taken their word for what they meant. This is because when bishops speak, they do not speak to please anybody, nor express the truth either fearfully or anonymously in the hope that some truth could be gathered from what they say. This is also because when they speak, they do not mince their words nor take sides, nor even fear to reprimand those in public office, especially if they have massively departed from right reason in the execution of their public office. When Bishops speak, it is with the aim to give definitive direction that can be trusted and followed by each and every citizen of the country in question. All of the above can best be said when we consider the salient words of an archbishop like you in El Salvador in Latin America. He said inter alia:
A church that suffers no persecution but enjoys the privileges and support of the things of the earth - beware! - is not the true church of Jesus Christ. A preaching that does not point out sin is not the preaching of the gospel. A preaching that makes sinners feel good, so that they are secured in their sinful state, betrays the gospel's call. When the church hears the cry of the oppressed it cannot but denounce the social structures that give rise to and perpetuate the misery from which the cry arises.[1]
I am not out here to elaborate on your purpose for speaking and why Bishops act the way they do especially as you know better than I do. However, we all remember very well what St. Paul enjoins on Timothy. “Preach the word, in season and out of season, and whether welcome or not insist on the truth” [2] I must tell your grace, that your letter compromised and in many ways diluted the message.
Preliminary Surprises
No sooner had I begun reading your message, than was I taken aback by some utterances that smack of somewhat complacency albeit anonymity and complicity in evil, thus in my opinion, lacked the authority with which our bishops are supposed to speak. Going through your message, I found some phrases, very worrisome, deeply disturbing and seemingly in my opinion terribly betraying the cause of the gospel in Cameroon and as your humble Christian, I will not be doing any serious duty to the Church nor to the country of which I am both a catholic Christian and a citizen if I remain silent. Our silence in the face of aggression means complicity so you will bear with my understanding and commentary on your message. In fact, I will not be performing my duties as a Christian if I remain silent without calling your attention to some pertinent issues raised by your message. This is because in the words of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI “Being a Christian is not the result of an ethical choice or a lofty idea, but the encounter with an event, a person, which gives life a new horizon and a decisive direction”.[3] We have been rather silent for too long, and this has reached a point where the leaders of this country have adopted positions, strategies and enacted decisions that are diametrically opposed to the demands of the Gospel. Permit me to mention these worrisome phrases, further permit me to dwell on some of them in the hope that in my own humble way I could somehow invite you into a closer reflection as we attempt to look at the underlying truths as well as lasting solutions that will lead our Christians and citizens who find themselves entrapped and being swayed in any direction by the storm of the present situation.
General Comments
Reading through your message, for someone who has already read the various collective and individual letters of the Bishops of the Bamenda Provincial Ecclesiastical Conference, (BAPEC), one wonders actually, in an overall manner, the use of this one that insists on belaboring what does not need to be belabored and probably causing more harm than good given the high delicacy of the situation. There is a glaring superficiality in the appeal and force in this message, if we have already read better things before, as seen in the honest, thorough and thoughtful Memorandum of BAPEC which the Head of State of Cameroon has on his table, and for which he has never lifted his hand to adequately and satisfactorily solve any one of the issues raised therein. If your fellow bishops have addressed the highest authority in this country and he cares less about the issues they raised, does that bother you at all? If those same bishops are successively being summoned by anonymous, unidentifiable groups under cover of the laws of this country in a hope to crack down on them, or maybe to clip their wings from raising their voice on behalf of a troubled and repressed people, does that still bother you? If individual bishops of those regions have been harassed albeit threatened or maybe pressurized by both some authorities of the state of Cameroon and by activists does that again bother you? Does the national Episcopal conference of Cameroon care to genuinely immerse itself into the root causes of the marginalized groups that live in the former British Cameroons? If you did, you would not forcefully and probably falsely, quote Holy Scripture to support the “unity” of this country, rather than in support of the collegiality that is supposed to govern such a message. (cf. your opening passage, from Scripture…). I feel deceived because I thought the National Episcopal Conference of Cameroon, was going to continue from where the Provincial Episcopal Conference of Bamenda left off and this would have brought the required impact needed to cause this regime to come to some measure of sanity. Does it occur to you that in actual fact, the Holy Father, Pope Francis, who has a copy of the Memorandum of BAPEC will be taken aback by this message of the President of the National Episcopal Conference in its silence to reaffirm the position and the stance of the Provincial Episcopal conference in calling to compel rather begging the authorities of this country to assume the responsibilities for which they occupy public offices? Your visits and the results you are having on the field are a clear indication that you massively departed from your responsibility to remind the government to take its responsibility in clear terms. And this is precisely what the faithful and the people of good will in these two regions were awaiting from the National Episcopal Conference. We have gone passed that stage. Your experience on the field shows that there needed to be field action before the message; and this again showed the superficiality with which you operated, just like those government officials, who pretend to understand the situation, and yet go ahead to take decisions and force a series of misguided and superficial solutions that have little or no bearing on the ground. That said, let us look at some very worrisome statements that keep us wondering if you the President of the National Episcopal Conference of Cameroon is aware of the real magnitude of the problem that has plagued the English-speaking regions of Cameroon.
The end of the message carried, “for the bishops of Cameroon” which meant two things for me; either you signed the message on behalf of the Bishops of Cameroon, which means they are party to the ideas therein, or that you actually sat down on your own count and wrote the letter on behalf of the Bishops of Cameroon, which means that you personally carry the responsibility of the content, “on behalf of the Bishops of Cameroon”. Whichever way, your tour of the Ecclesiastical Province of Bamenda did somehow prove the point, and hopefully by now you should positively or negatively be coming to terms with the realities on the ground in those two regions. Again, whichever way, you (and/or other Bishops who also are not convinced of some of the utterances in the message), will excuse me for betimes including all the Bishops in some of my references.
THE WORRISOME STATEMENTS
<>.[4] If the President of the Episcopal Conference of Cameroon, took into consideration the Memorandum of the Bishops of the Provincial Ecclesiastical Province of Bamenda, and if he did himself some service of studying the real history of this country, he would have realized that, in all honesty to history, this country in its English and French expressions and origins, has never had one colonial heritage nor one traditional heritage. The implication at this stage is that building such diverse entities and offering any solution or project or systems in these parts of the country, must obligatorily take into consideration the diverse colonial and traditional entities which becomes a very delicate as it is an arduous task. It is glaring from this that the leaders of this country have never taken that into consideration. They have rather been struggling in a futile and frantic manner, to stitch together what cannot be stitched and they are doing so very badly probably because their training in public administration has never taken this into consideration. This means that either they subscribe to the deceptive presentation of this country’s history or they are slaves thereof. It is glaringly clear from history and political practice in the country, proven by the recent instructions of the Prime Minister, that those aspects that concerned language were never taken into consideration in the first place and so explains why the English-speaking part of the country has never felt being taken into consideration. Language I say, clearly, is but a minute part of this problem. Do you know why the Anglophones become deeply annoyed when anyone especially from government pretentiously assumes and rattles the constitution, aptly described by one disgruntled Anglophone as a “Napoleonic code”, that English and French are the official languages of this country of equal magnitude? It is because such statements have hardly been taken into consideration in real practice in this country. It is clear, that the Francophone part of this country and its leaders have vehemently and continuously pursued the evil policies of assimilation practiced by their own colonial masters and you can see that the colonial cultures that came from their own colonial heritage have been a continuous obstacle to any experiment of unity in this country, because in real practice they have been terribly obnoxious to the Anglophones. Unfortunately, the Anglophones, being the minority, have been suffering under this yoke for about fifty-five years, yet the Francophone leaders, who already saw their dominance as success, cannot now come to terms with the fact that, as one of our leaders put it, “a slave has suddenly risen up in the master’s house and asked a question”.[5] Permit me to remind you in clear terms, that the fictitious assumptions and propaganda about national unity and integration as sung and “celebrated” by the government and its apostles in this country has never worked, is not working and will never work. Talk less of the fact that there exists no treaty of union between these two entities. If there is one, I will like someone in this country to present it to the people of this country and they will lay down their claims.
“Nous avions déjà appelé les différents protagonistes a un dialogue franc et sincère »… « les évêques de la Province Ecclésiastique de Bamenda ont également pris position à ce propos, invitant toutes les parties au dialogue »
            Needless to remind you that obvious results of that frank and sincere dialogue as you claim you invited the protagonists of the strike actions were to be expected. Why? Because you were talking to one party concerned in the crisis. But the Bishops of the Bamenda Ecclesiastical Province, if I can remember very well, have called for unrivalled dialogue between the government of Cameroon and the parties in pain. This means that the real protagonists include the government and the people of the Southern Cameroons and these are the groups you were supposed to invite to a frank dialogue. These in our opinion or rather mine, were the first steps from which we expected the National Episcopal Conference to take continue. It is the prerogative of the government to fulfill the necessary conditions and lay the groundwork for such frank dialogue with the suffering people of these regions on the same table and not that disorderly crowd as you propose in your message if at all they are to be considered as citizens of this “one nation” with equal rights and privileges. Is the Episcopal Conference of this country afraid or does it see itself as being too small or incompetent or is it that they are just unconcerned about the plight of a people in pain, to undertake the role of mediator in this crisis? It would be a terrible betrayal of the gospel if they dare to drink from the aggressor’s cup. If the Episcopal Conference of Cameroon, like their brothers in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, could rise up as one person and call the government of this country to order, things will be different, and that will be giving them the free hand to be able to freely take the “option for the poor” seriously. Remember the common saying, united we stand, divided we fall. I want you to understand it not in your terms but to the effect, that if the Francophone Bishops of this country were to unite their voice with what their Anglophone confreres have already done, what a big influence, that would be. Have they not been troubled by the mediocre, incompetent and rather high-handed manner in which the government is handling the crisis, imbued with terrible Machiavellian methods meant at nothing but terrible suppression and repression of the people already in pain? And remember that the regime in this country is skilled in the divide-and-rule tactics of manipulation of the people. The Church exists not to recite the stale and divisive statements of government ministers but as a barometer to conscientize the leaders of this country. The Catholic Church in Cameroon is not and should not assume the status of an Anglican Church, where we have to give account to the state which is the boss of the Church, we are not a state Church, please your excellency, the Catholic Church is the conscience of the Cameroonian society, and in this case, she is supposed, in her role as Teacher and Mother, to assume her responsibilities squarely as the voice of the voiceless. Her prophetic role in this country must not be dullen by any intimidations, ideologies or policies. Remember, Jeremiah, the prophet before you did just what he had to do, John the Baptist did, Jesus did so why will you not do it? Let the voiceless of the North West and South West regions, not suffer and liberate themselves through their own means without you, because someday they will be obliged to rise up and denounce you for taking sides with their oppressors. Please, the Church in these regions is already suffering enough at the hands of this regime, and do not create more problems for them, because it will render the mission of evangelization of the Catholic Church in these regions very arduous and very frustrating for the shepherds who lead the flock in these regions. Reflect about this, if a people suffer on their own, left to themselves, while the Bishops keep reciting some niceties as required by the regime, or while they keep playing some measure of ostrich politics, where do you imagine they will place the Church after they come out of the struggle against this repressive regime? If the Church keeps quiet, then they should forever shut their mouths thereafter. So, what stops you from re-enforcing the voice of the BAPEC Bishops and reiterating their position to free the people of these regions?
<[6]
Permit me to ask you a sincere and honest question. Is Cameroon, especially in its present dispensation, a state of Law? Has it always favoured the expression of faith in a manner that you have to praise them for doing so? If so, what about the murders of the numerous Bishops, Priests and religious, (The Catholic Church in Cameroon has suffered a number of suspicious deaths over the years: In October 1988, Fr. Joseph Mbassi, a journalist, was murdered while investigating the arms trade in Cameroon. His body was found in his room bloodied and mangled on the morning of October 26. Abbot Bernabé Zambo of the archdiocese of Bertoua died on March 24, 1989. Media speculate he was poisoned by someone as an act of revenge. Father Anthony Fontegh of Kumbo was murdered in 1990. Bishop Yves Plume was strangled to death in his room in Ngaoundéré at the Minor Seminary in September. In 1992, Fr. Amougou of Sangmelima was killed in his rectory. On April 23, 1995, Fr. Engelbert Mveng was found strangled to death with a gash in his head, and no items stolen from his room. On April 21, 2001, Fr. Apollinaire Claude Ndi of Nkoltob was found murdered by an unknown man in Yaoundé. On Christmas Eve, 2008, Fr. François Xavier Mekong’s body was discovered in one of the showers of the rectory and a host of other priests and religious), whose causes have always been shrouded in endless commissions of enquiries? Remember, that the Pope Saint John Paul II’s major preoccupation when he visited Cameroon, was about the serial eliminations and murders of the Church’s clergy in this country. I even wonder why the Vatican still keeps diplomatic relations with such a country that cannot guarantee the free expression of faith and lives of the clergy. However, by putting yourself in such a very precarious controversial position, you have forgotten that you could be the next. The regime for which you literally stalled the functioning of your diocese and seemingly went out to preach “unity” on its behalf cannot and will never protect you, and once they do not need you, what do you imagine will happen to you? Your excellency, with what is welling up in me about this statement, you need to go and have a rethink. Permit me to remind you of what one of you, the Archbishop Emeritus of Douala, Christian Cardinal Tumi, your very predecessor, once said, when he was being threatened by one government minister, “if Cameroon were a state of law, I will drag you to court”. He is still alive and it is still written. We would have imagined that you being his successor will for once, keep the steam and resemblance of his mission for which he became, “the prince of the Church” in Cameroon. Which state of law have you suddenly awoken to praise? “And one of them named Cleopas asked him, are you the only visitor in Jerusalem, who is not aware of the happenings these past days?” (cf. Luke 24: 18). Are the Bishops the only ones who are not aware that there have been arbitrary arrests, kidnaps, rapes, torture, killings, in fact, genocide being orchestrated and carried out by the regime which has been condemned by international bodies? If you want to doubt me, let me refer you the latest terrorism law that has just been passed in this country which is a blatant example of the catalogue of obnoxious laws that are skillfully aimed at protecting the powerful to always remain in power in this country. Have you also forgotten the government ministers in this country who have in their turns struggled to stifle even Catholic Education and Anglo-Saxon Education in this country? Let me quote to you the reigns of former Ministers George Ngangoh, Mbella Mbappe and that of the present Minister of Higher Education, Fame Ndongo. Are we that complacent? Let me visit you with a living truth: are you aware that the government of this country, will never and can never give a full account of those arrested, injected with deadly chemicals, murdered, or the numerous disappearances that have recently taken place in these regions following the Anglophone crisis? The Chairman of the National Human Rights commission has already attested to it, that the regime in power cannot fully account for everyone kidnapped and arrested in the North West and South West regions? (cf. Dr. Chemuta Divine Banda, Chairman CNDHL). Can the bishops not see that their task is so enormous and stretches so far as to demand the revision of laws, Constitution, biased and whimsical tax laws and uncountable decrees that have been purposefully protecting those in power and higher positions in this country? If not, why do you think they are always in a quick rush to quote the Constitution and laws of this country confidently – those “Napoleonic codes” that have been twisted to suit the whims and caprices of the clique that rules this country and anyone who does not belong to it, will not be protected. If the demands of the teachers and lawyers called to question the very nature of the state, is it not justified? Are the bishops, the only ones who are not aware that according to the high-handedness of the government and the victimization of the protagonists concerned, they were to assume their role to call the government in a true spirit of collegiality to order? Can the bishops be so honest as to mention to me, just one sector, in Cameroon that they call one, that is moving well if any? Is there any part of this chaotic demagogy that is working at all? Therefore, the continuous mention and/or insinuation of unity, one state and others in your message is an annoying reminder of the same irresponsible, unstatesmanlike and divisive statements and utterances that have successively been made by the president of this country, Mr. Paul Biya, the Minister of Communications, Issa Tchiroma Bakary, the Governor of the South West Region, Okalia Bilai, and others in their turns and levels coupled with the terrible roles they have played in this crisis. These statements overtly and specifically referred to the Anglophones as “extremists”, “terrorists”, “separatists”, “boko haram”, and remember that these statements referred to a people who have never raised a single gun, or arms against the government and her repressive forces of this country. The shameless sung of “one and indivisible” Cameroon has become a slogan that anybody can use to show his allegiance to the demagogue that sits mightily and heavily upon this anarchy called country. Again, this country or the two parts of this country, having no treaty of union, has never been one, and in political practice, has never been governed as one, (testified by the divisive and deceptive manipulations from the regime and the marginalization that you and I can testify to), and so will never and can never ever, anymore be regarded as one. Are the bishops also under the hypnotic influence of the powers that govern this country? Has a spell been cast over you that you cannot liberate yourselves from the shackles of complacency in order to liberate your people from the oppressive and repressive dictatorship that reigns in this country? If the bishops are so complacent, what do you expect international bodies to think about you and your participation in true political life of the two entities? It will be very interesting and challenging to take the footsteps of your brother bishops of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, who took the courage, in collegiality to differ and out-rightly so, with the government. If you recite the same statements of government adherents, who do you stand for? Are the bishops not aware of the systematic pillage of the resources and economy of this country with impunity, emptying of the state resources into private pockets and accounts, and what have you to say about this? When I mention all these, it is not with the intention of just quoting instances, it is to remind you, that the root causes of these problems are far-reaching, the pain of which has eaten deep into the citizens of this country (and do not deceive yourselves that only the Anglophones are hurting), and if some say they will hold their government responsible, I think they have a right to do so. Can the bishops of this country, not as one person hold the leaders of this country accountable for the deep-seated hatred sown among its citizens, for the blood of the innocent priests and religious, for the blood of innocent citizens killed in cold blood? Why do you insist to keep a blind eye to all the deep-seated evil that is governing this country? Do you really need David to remind you that occultists have taken this country hostage and that is why your very roles as bishops are being compromised? Do you really need me to tell you that the leaders of this country need you bishops only when you represent no real danger to their inordinate greed, call it overbearing self-interest or when you remain complacent to their devilish agendas? Remember that complacency breeds complicity. If you doubt what I am telling, then you will not be doing any justice to yourselves as I can testify to what the Bishops of the Ecclesiastical Province of Bamenda have faced in the hands of government officials for “not allowing catholic schools to resume” in fact for not allowing their agenda to prevail over the people of these regions and also for not being accomplices to the Machiavellian measures that have been overtly employed to keep the people of these regions under repressive check. If this country, were a state of law, the Bishops of the Ecclesiastical Province of Bamenda, would never ever, under any circumstances whatsoever be dragged to court through the complicity of the state and some anonymous fellows hiding under the guise of state courts to unleash their hatred for the Church – a thing which I find very strange, and terrible that the National Episcopal Conference of the Bishops of Cameroon did not come out openly to condemn or clearly take a stand on.
“No 7 of your message in its entirety”.
Your excellency, the state of Cameroon in its present dispensation is a massive betrayal to the demands of social justice, equality and freedom. Calling for all these parties, is calling for another national conference, except that you were afraid to mention it? Cameroon needs another national conference through which the state of Cameroon by the present crisis is called to revisit its very essence, its very nature as a unitary state, with its absolute concentration of powers on one dictator, and which has brought nothing but the present socio-economic and political calamities it is witnessing. But more than that, it should be brave enough to face a referendum if at all it depends on the people and their wills and votes for existence. Those in power have been a massive betrayal to the confidence of the people and they have terribly abused this, which means that the Cameroonians are left with no other option now than to exercise their civic rights which also entitles them to withdraw their allegiance from them and that is what those in the English-speaking regions have begun to do. I will not be surprised that it may spread to other parts of the country if they do not change to pro populo strategies soonest than later. From the high-handed handling of this crisis, I have now been convinced that there was never one vision and one goal for this nation?
            No 10: Concerning the Schools and the return to classes… “Nous confirmons le droit inaliénable a l’éducation reconnue à toute personne humaine”. Your excellency, permit me to call to mind the following which has either ignorantly or deliberately been ignored or kept aside by everyone talking about inalienable rights of the human person  and which you come to it in the usual manner as do others. According to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the African Charter of Human Rights, The Preamble of the Constitution of Cameroon, I feel obliged to remind you that the human person does not have only one inalienable right (right of education). The citizens who live in Cameroon also have amongst others, the right to free movement, the right of expression, the right of education, the right to freedom of religion …. [7]
When so much noise has been made about the inalienable right to education, equal noise should also be made about the other inalienable rights of the human person. I guess the protagonists who have been singing the stale song of the inalienable right to education are so silent on the other inalienable rights because they have been shamelessly and secretly or wantonly violating these rights of the people. They cannot elicit that because they are guilty of grave violation of the inalienable rights of the people. We need to be honest to ourselves and to this government and be frank to them in all openness. Let us stop being complacent because we may not find it easy to release ourselves from such accusations and most importantly, from the condemnation and rejection of Christ whose Church you are leading in Cameroon. That said, I find your invitation to the parents and your subsequent meetings not only monotonously stupid but also unrealistic. You have proven yourselves as accomplices to those government ministers who sing about school reopening so many times in one and the same academic year and worst of all, at a time when it is practically not possible to do so. Mgr. Kleda’s visits to the various Dioceses of these two regions, are not different from those of a government minister as if, in a futile attempt to salvage his image from the watchful eyes of a grandmaster. Whom did he want to please; the government or who indeed? The government of this country, having terribly failed to bring back their own public schools have absolutely no right, to lay the blame on the shoulders of any Bishop, having ignored the Memorandum of the Bishops of BAPEC. Logistically speaking no reasonable school could effectively resume in May and so what is really the purpose of wasting precious Church money, (or were his visits financed by the government?) to go around and campaign for the return to school of the children while the bishops are still being dragged to court by anonymous thugs and ghost association backed by the government. Was he for or against the bishops of the Bamenda Ecclesiastical Province? Have you forgotten that the school year is already wasted, and that you were supposed to advise this regime to put aside those divisive, deceptive and manipulative agendas that promote and further deepen the already existing socio-political avalanche, and embrace serious and appropriate measures to ensure that they solve the problems of the people in view of the coming academic year 2017/2018? Why do you fall along with the mediocrity of those government officials? Why do you give in to this conformist mentality that has overtaken nearly everyone in this country? Were you not supposed to put appropriate pressure on the regime in power in this country to attempt even one credible solution for the resumption of schools next year 2017/2018? What will classes fulfil in the three weeks of resumption? Why can’t you see that the few who attended school this year might just have done so to salvage the fees they paid before the strike action overtook them. Why do you not have foresight, what has gone wrong with your vision to establish long term solutions that will assure the parents to send back their children next academic year rather than trust a deceptive regime that cannot leverage.
            “No 2” Invoking the strike action”.
One of the key claims, of the striking parties (and I will say, of the people of the North West and South West Regions) was summarized in the word, “marginalization”. Permit me to differ with government, that this is a language problem. Marginalization as experienced by the citizens of these two regions for the past 55 years[8]  cuts across the fabric of all aspects of life, social, political and worst of all, economic. And no one can claim to keep a blind eye to this especially the Bishops of Cameroon. The Memorandum quoted above was very informative and exhaustive about the whole situation and for the government of Cameroon to ignore this and as if that were not enough drag these Bishops to court as if to punish them for it, is a serious cause for concern. According to the complaints of the teachers and the lawyers, the implication of the resumption to school is this: that, children should get back into a renewed and rejuvenated school system with all its full-fledged capacities and properties before we can talk about school. As far as we are concerned, the government of Cameroon has not even achieved this, which shows a serious unwillingness, and lack of good faith in solving the situation. Instead, they offer divisive solutions that are aimed at isolating and victimizing individual teachers. I am convinced that the demands of the teachers request a total overhaul of the school system. I find the present powers that be, massively incompetent and not willing to accept their incompetence in solving the situation. In attempting to convince the parents, to send back their children to school at such a time and still in the same conditions, what service do you think you are offering to solve the educational crisis in Cameroon that have plagued the English sub-system of education for the past years. Is that according to you, the promotion of the inalienable rights to education?
GENERAL CONCLUSIONS
Your letter seems to be promoting government agenda upon the people of which you are fast becoming its protagonists maybe in the hope of saving yourselves from the anger of the powers that be. This is not speaking on behalf of the oppressed and repressed minority in these regions; that is not protecting the marginalized; that is not being the voice of the voiceless as demanded by the social teachings of the Catholic Church of which you are the custodians and which you know better than I do.
            The bishops of Cameroon, our dear shepherds, should immediately desist, and liberate themselves from the temptation of complicity with occultists and freemasons, who have taken this country hostage in the name of governing the people. When will this endless quagmire be cleared so that the image of God, the person of Christ should again regain its prominence. Remember that the founders of our faith in this country dedicated this country to the patronage of the Blessed Virgin Mary, but what has become of it? Our shepherds should be courageous and spiritually strong enough to steer clear of the hypnotism that has taken the inhabitants of this land into complicity and complacency with the evil that is being institutionalized in this fatherland. That is the challenge, that is the implication of the service to which they have been called. Do not betray the fullness of the Holy Spirit that is in you. Do not let the words of Ezekiel (Remember Ezekiel 22: 25; 27 and Ezek. 34: 1-10) about the wicked leaders and complicity of the shepherds who ignore the fate of their sheep to apply to you. Do not make God’s Holy Spirit sad. The United Nations cannot and should not be doing better than the Bishops of this country who have both the spiritual and social responsibility to direct this nation when it goes astray. Do not keep a blind eye to the inherent evil that is the reason for the massive dissatisfaction of the citizens of this country, else they will rise up and condemn you for supporting an overtly dictatorial regime, that has no concern for the poor and the marginalized. You are aware, as does regrettably, the international community, that government utterances, especially as expressed by the government spokesperson, in the person of the Minister of Communications, Issa Tchiroma, shrouded in the language of love of peace, dialogue, rule of law, constitution, public order, state of law, etc., followed the brutal military crackdown in these two regions, are but overt pretenses to let the government agenda to prevail on a suffering people whom you are supposed to defend according to the demands of the Gospel of Jesus Christ for whom you are the primary custodians.
We, your Christians were deceived to think that you stand to direct and correct the president of this country in his leadership role over the people of Cameroon, but you seem to have fallen into the doldrum where all the powers in this country are heavily concentrated on one person, only one person thinks, only one person decides, only one person’s will prevails, only one person can give out of his largesse to the suffering people of this country, and only one person decides the fate of all. Are you not eye-witnesses to the anarchy that reigns in this country? Are you not eye-witnesses to the demagogy that has become the order of the day? Are you not eye-witnesses to untold sufferings of the people, the very sons and daughters of this fatherland whom you are called to serve, to save, to liberate from the shackles of oppression and repression? And why are you not lifting a hand to liberate the suffering masses of Cameroon?
            We cannot afford to offer paper-plaster solutions for which we ourselves are not convinced and to which we cannot be committed without grave danger to the basic demands of our faith. We cannot afford to insist on camouflage and plastic solutions that will breed anger and dissension instead of the peace and unity you want to preach. You and I are quite aware, that there is no freedom of speech, no freedom of expression in this country. This is exemplified by the arbitrary incarceration of journalists in this country, with cases that have no real substance apart from the fact that they were not praise-singing for the government and under the guise of “ethics and deontology” the very terminology that you have mentioned in your message, they have been unjustly condemned. Do I need to remind you of the unjust laws that have become the order of the day in Cameroon, meant to protect the interest of those in power? We all are aware that the youth of this country have no future, nothing definite is carved out to guarantee their responsible belonging to the political dispensation in Cameroon, talk less of the youths in the marginalized regions North West and South West regions of Cameroon. Why have you bishops been keeping a conspicuous silence with regards to the terrible sufferings of the young people of these regions. What stops the bishops from using their authority, their God-given authority to stand as one person, not just to express indifferent wishes to government, but vehemently denounce these ills in all their ramifications.
            In order to genuinely liberate the people of the North West and South West regions from the hands of a regime that has systematically shut down all hopes of any genuine dialogue as well as all structures for development, the Church must obligatorily be an integral companion of their socio-economic and political history. If you doubt this, take a walk through these regions and you will testify to the long-standing pain of the people of these regions. What do you think of a regime that willfully and purposefully depart from offering meaningful and well directed solutions to the demands of the very people they have oppressed for over fifty-five years. Lack of good faith, butchery, raping and divisiveness are their usual strategies and the Church must steer clear of.
            The Catholic Church in her mission in Cameroon has a definitively divine mandate to lead the people of this country, irrespective of their religious affiliations to a divine finality, and so should not comport herself as if she took instructions from a regime which, as we all know, has persistently and purposefully messed up and confused public policy with political propaganda. She does not and should not behave as if she receives instructions on her administration and spiritual roles from the state. Instead, she stands to direct and lead the administrators of this country to the fullness of the truth irrespective of their political agendas and affiliations. Again, she is called to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ, which was in every way the Gospel of liberation from physical, social, political and spiritual bondage, she is obliged to insist on the truth and in full awareness of the mandate handed over to her by her Head – Jesus Christ and not the president of the country. The Catholic Church has the highest moral voice in the world, and that voice cannot be diminished or silenced by ineffective, corrupt, aberrative and dictatorial regimes. Therefore, the Bishops of this country need rise up as one person, and out-rightly face this regime until it keeps its filthy hands of the Church and her leaders, until occultists stop meddling in the functioning and management of the Church; until it begins to respect the sanctity of the human person; until it begins to enact laws that respect for human rights and freedoms.
            I implore you, to have a radical rethink of your stance, take up your responsibilities fully, and save the suffering minorities of these regions. This is not just the task of the Provincial Bishops Conference, and if they perform their duties to remind the government of its responsibilities, the National Episcopal Conference should be supportive enough as not to pour cold water on the attempts of the Bishops of the Ecclesiastical Province of Bamenda. I am fully aware of risk involved in a message as this one, and I take full responsibility for this write-up, as I already know the obvious reaction, especially of government when they are always told the truth that they do not want to hear. My effort at imploring you to take urgent action to salvage this country from its socio-economic and political calamity, is tantamount to that of John the Baptist whose head will soon be demanded on a platter. Again, if I did ask any questions, they were not meant to challenge your authority and capabilities to lead us out of the land of Egypt, out of the land of Pharaoh and the Egyptians; they were meant to enable a much deeper and radical reflection that would bring this country to an admirable end. And let me leave you with the following question and reflection from St. Paul’s Letter to the Romans, “who, then, can separate us from the love of Christ? Can trouble do it, or hardship or persecution or hunger or poverty or danger or death…” (Rom. 8: 35 – 39).
            Some Updates to end up…
            To end up, I will treat you to a deep reflection on following passage from one of us: The transfer of the Apostolic Nuntio from Yaounde to Indonesia, albeit a decision reached two or more weeks before it was announced, came to be known at a time when the regime of LRC is manifesting the highest, ever known persecution of the Church leaders of the mainline Churches: Presbyterian and Catholics as well. It is only comparable to the reign of the anti-Christ, when Christ indicated that Government will drag his followers to court, and persecute some. Immediately after the news of the death of the Bishop of Bafia, and the quick conclusion regarding suicide... every inspired eye could discern that there has been some foul play. The post-mortem... if confirmed as reported does not only manifest the Satanic presence in Cameroon, but makes the perpetrators to equal those who mutilated the body of Christ on the cross, executing him naked and piercing his side with a lance, causing him to drink vinegar for water.... What a country!!! If this had been done by an enemy.... we would have borne it.... But it is done to the very leaders of the Church with a Catholic Christian Leader at the head of the nation... As if this is not enough.... the disrespect continues with the so called "Court summons" in Buea and Bamenda!!! Forgetting that the day chosen was just the Day after Pentecost when the sons of light just received the Spirit that empowers them to fear not even the murderers... A heartless regime that would not even allow the Church to bury the dead, but at the heart of its mourning time for their college member, opens up an inquiry that worries about whether taxes were paid to Caesar or not.... Money, Power, Ritual Killings, Fetish influences, worries over elections... and you can name the rest.... Not worries about whether a people are living in freedom, justice, unity, peace, harmony and love... Did the spirit LRC and its associates in SC receive a spirit of fear and timidity? This is indeed the reign of darkness. May the Holy Spirit come... Come with your light and shine, brighten up the paths and cause your rays to impart the fruits and the gifts.... we are sinking Lord... we are really sinking.... Come to our aid and make us cry "Abba Father!!!" (cf. David Nkong, on Facebook post)
            Some practical Actions to Consider…
1.     What stops you, the shepherds of the people of this country, from openly denouncing the murderous performance of the Catholic President who has failed both as a Christian to secure the protection of the freedom of expression and of religion in this country and instead embarked with the devilish perpetrators of this regime to openly persecute the Church and at the same time would imagine that his recent hypocritical, pretentious parade in Rome to cajole the Holy Father to come to Cameroon, as if to indicate his affiliations with the Vatican and with the Church, while his undercover activities are skillfully geared at silencing the truth that comes from the Church in Cameroon. What stops you from openly reminding him to keep his filthy hands off the Church leaders and Christianity in this country? What stops you from asking his residential Bishop to take the appropriate Canonical steps that you know better than me to bring him to some measure of sanity. We cannot hide our heads anymore in the sand and continue to die. Dear Bishops of Cameroon, not one of you is safe in this system, you are not safe, we are not safe, no one is safe inasmuch as he stands with the truth.
2.     What stops the Bishops’ Conference in Cameroon from imploring the Vatican to completely severing Diplomatic ties with this country until the safety and security of its clergy and religious are guaranteed and the free expression of faith restored.
3.     What stops the Bishops’ Conference in Cameroon from appealing to the international community to exert appropriate pressure on the dictatorial regime in Cameroon to come to order and place an embargo on its demagogue, economic sanctions and other politically permissible measures to restore reason in this country?
4.     What stops the Bishops’ Conference in Cameroon from asking this regime to release political prisoners and those considered as threats to their egotistic, occultic practices, and to demand that they give full account of its kidnaps, killings, attacks on innocent citizens and its overbearing manipulation of some citizens against others?
5.     What stops the Episcopal Conference of Cameroon from grinding this dictatorial, Machiavellian political system to a halt so that they should have a complete re-think and complete overhaul – and this would be a proper regard for the common good of the people of Cameroon? If some of you have been accorded privileged positions in this country, I call on you now, that this is not the time to stay glued to your position of “security” or “privilege”; remember that any such position that keeps you without your flock in such a position, is willfully intended to compromise the truth and propagate the evil that has become unbearable in this country and from this point you will be regarded as accomplices to the evil that thrives.
6.     What then stops you from exercising your collegiality and speaking up as one person and let us see how this regime will kill all the Bishops of Cameroon, or do anything with the existence of the Church and her freedom to exercise her Divine mandate in this Fatherland.
            With prayerful best wishes.

Done in Bamenda, in honour of the African Martyrs, Saints Charles Lwanga & his Companions and for those who continue to lose their lives in the hands of Dictatorial Regimes.
Mbiydzenyuy David WANTANGWA,


[1] Archbishop Oscar Arnulfo Romero, March 11,1979.
[2] 2 Timothy 4: 2.
[3] Encyclical Letter Deus Caritas Est (25 December 2005), 1: AAS 98 (2006), 217.
[4] One nation assuming at the same time its colonial and traditional heritages.
[5] Cfr. The epoch making speech of Wirba Joseph in the National Assembly of The Republic of Cameroon, 2016.
[6] “reconnaissant l’Etat de droit et gardant la fidèle mémoire de la manière dont cet Etat a toujours favorisé l’expression de la foi de croyants… »
[7] Cfr. Preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948.
[8] Cfr. Memorandum of the Bishops of the Bamenda Ecclesiastical Provincial conference December 2016.

BIYA'S REGIME HAS NO CASE AGAINST ANGLOPHONE LEADERS, By Mbiydzenyuy D. WANTANGWA




THIS GLARING CONFUSION IN THE CASE OF OUR LEADERS IS A CLEAR INDICATION TO THE FACT THAT THE GOVERNMENT OF LA REPUBLIQUE DU CAMEROUN HAS NO CASE. WE SHOULD NOT HIT AND RUN, WE SHOULD INTENSIFY OUR APPEALS TO THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY, ESPECIALLY THE UN AND THE AU. IT IS NOT NORMAL THAT A BLATANT DICTATORSHOP SHOULD KIDNAP PEOPLE JUST BECAUSE THEY POINT OUT THEIR WRONGS, PUT THEM IN PRISON, AND CONTINUE TO PLAY GAMES WITH THIER LIVES, AND THE FUTURE OF THE CAREER AND FAMILIES FOR WHICH IT HAS NO VALUE, NO RESPECT, NOT EVEN ANY REAL SANITY. How long shall the International Community continue to watch the criminal regime of Paul Biya, continue to play with our leaders' lives? How long will Western Powers continue to watch the blatant violations of human rights in all its magnitude? Are they waiting for bloodshed before they can lift their hands to bring this dictator to his senses. How long shall humanity continue to watch a moving shadow torture his own people and enjoy suffering them, repressing them in prison and military courts made up of mediocres who have no respect for the basic requirements and demands of the UN Charter on Human Rights, and all others which Cameroun signed and ratified? THE BIYA KANGAROO MILITARY TRIBUNAL TO CONSIDER JUDICIAL SUPERVISION ON THE NEXT SESSION SCHEDULED FOR THE 7TH OF JUNE 2017. THEY ARE CONFUSED. THE DEMANDS OF THE UN IS THAT THE CASE IS ONE, THEY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS ONE CASE. THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO DIVIDE AND RULE, THE USUAL EVIL POLICY OF THIS REGIME. WE CANNOT TAKE THAT FOR THIS INCOMPETENT COURT STRUGGLING TO UNDERSTAND THEIR ROLE IN THIS CASE. TYPICAL OF MEDIOCRITY AND MACHIAVELLIAN STRATEGIES. JUST A BAND OCCULTIST WORKING FROM A COMMON POSITION. WE CANNOT ACCEPT THIS. EITHER YOU RELEASE ALL OUR LEADERS WITHOUT CONDITIONS OR YOU KEEP THEM AND FACE THE CONSEQUENCES. AFTER ALL, YOU HAVE DISGRACED YOURSELVES ENOUGH, SO JUST CONTINUE TO WALLOW IN YOUR EVIL AND CONFUSION...

WE DEMAND AN UNCONDITIONAL FREEDOM FOR OUR LEADERS...



Our three days mission in Cameroon a very successful one.
~Any further union for Cameroon nurses the third world war. A A Ebieche.
~Though funny but worth reading. Cameroon, one and indivisible as the case maybe But we were prompted to know that there exist three Cameroons and on three different territories. There are; the East Cameroon, the North Cameroon and West Cameroon respectfully.
~Its appeared that there have never existed any one Cameroon even before and after the first world war since the early 1914.
WORTH TO NOTE°
I »German«
The German did not colonies neither did they administered Cameroon as a territory.
II »British and French«
The British and French did not divide neither did they succeed in uniting Cameroon.
Although it is said there was a joint Anglo-French administration (Condominium) in Cameroon from 1914 to 1916, which end up in total fiasco.
There have never existed any condominium between the 1914 and 1916 in the history of Cameroon.
THE REASONS FOR THE INAPPLICABILIT OF A CONDOMINIUM IN CAMEROON°
The fundamental differences between the British and the French regarding the modalities of its application and execution.
The German finally left Cameroon without the British and the French having any effective establishment of a CONDOMINIUM IN CAMEROONS territories.
THERE WERE TWO FUNDAMENTAL ISSUES WHICH SABOTAGE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FRENCH PROPOSED CONDOMINIUM.
1 "The Authority Issue"
2 "The Territorial Issue"
The British wanted that the condominium be extended to all territories of German Cameroon jointly or separately conquered.
The French refused and insisted that the condominium be applied only to territories conquered by the joint Anglo-French force and areas separately conquered be administered alone by the victorious allied power.
QUESTIONS
I~ Why was East Cameroon granted self independent if Cameroon was one?
II~ What was the reaction of the East Cameroon when gaining independent away from their North and West Cameroon?
III~ What if the West Cameroon did not plebiscite in favor of the East Cameroon given that the faith of the election was not fare as par ce "yes and oui"
IV~ Why have the East Cameroon chosen to abandoned it's other part to Nigeria if Cameroon was one and indivisible from origin?
V~ Why didn't the one and indivisible Cameroon have something common to justify it's statement as to Cameroon is one and indivisible?
VI~ Does Cameroon has a map representing the three different territories as one Cameroon?
VII~ What was the reason for a plebiscite if Cameroon was one?
VIII~ If one part of Cameroon completely is in exile per the Northern Cameroon isn't it enough reason to show that the condominium between the British and French was never successful because there was totally nothing that could keep the two together?
IX~ Giving that the British and French did not succeed to effectively established a condominium in the territory isn't it enough reason to show that there is never anything that can ever work uniquely between the two except one has to completely surrender for the interest of the other?
X~ Did any of the three territories have authority over the others?
XI~ Which of the three territories has authority over the others?
XII~ Why three authoritative Cameroon given power over others?
XIII~ And if all the above did not succeed in any aspect in the past what then is there to expect in the present or even the future?

Do you know that The British Southern Cameroon has never had a Treasury? By Jack Stam Rollins



GET ANGRY.

Do you know that The British Southern Cameroon has never had a Treasury? What does that mean to you? By 3pm everyday, Transversal transfers all cash gathered in the N.W. Region to Bafousam and all cash in the S.W. Region is transported to Douala. The only 2 Regions without a Treasury, why? We are not part of them. They are out just to exploit us. Take our oil, timber, Gold, bauxite, and other precious stones. And they can't even save the money with us, what a distrust. Even the money, they are taking it away from us. All industries are centralised in the Francophone zones and SW and NW relegated to the background. Besides all the crude oil from the SW Region, not even one SCDP station is found in the Southern Cameroon. Besides all the rise - ups from the Ndian group against oil exploitation without benefits, the biggest SCDP station in Central Africa is under construction in Kribi, not still in the Southern Cameroon. Ndian people especially the Bakassi 'take note that the Kribi SCDP station was conceived after the fake or better still mediocre promise made to you. It's almost finished and they are still making promises to come and start works in Isangele. Was it not to begin in November? Then sent to January, now to ...... Rrrhhhhh this makes me roar like a lion. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. Forwarded as recieved General Jack Stam Steel Rollins..,

Elect your new own Government NOW! By Christopher Messner


DEAR AMBAZONIANS,

The ghost town strikes are a wonderful and effective way of resistance against an illegitimate occupation army which may not be much longer loyal to such a senile, untrustworthy embezzler like Mr. Biya. Even France will drop him soon for his incompetent and illegal actions. Nevertheless while the human rights violations and arrests of Ambazonian leaders are increasing still, the Ambazonian population should be aware, that no little scattered, lousy "army" of corrupt dictators has any chance against 8 million determined Ambazonians, and that Ambazonia can open its constituent assembly or government all the same right now, because it does not need any OK from foreign nations for that. And as soon as the occupation forces try to close any ministry of the (interim) Ambazonia Government, it can re-open that ministry immediately at just another location! Be tactical and confuse your enemy! Also the UN has granted Ambazonia independence since 1984 and the UN Convention for the LAW of the SEA grants Ambazonia full property of its oil and gas as well up to 200 miles from the shore, so Ambazonia can actually forbid Sonara and La Kleptocratique du Craboon the stealing of the oil. As soon as Ambazonia promises Exxon and British Petrol some higher share (without being pulled over the table!), the USA and UK and Nigeria and even may be Spain will support Ambazonia by allowing an own Ambazonia Army to defend from the French. And together with a new Constitution of Ambazonia, which guarantees that the revenues of the oil (taxes) and agricultural exports will flow back to the Ambazonian People, Ambazonia will become unbeatable and the admired pearl of Africa. And on top of that, the new Ambazonia Government can organize a referendum soon after, in which the many tribes can vote on a new name for the nation, which is not a colonizer's name anymore, but a native languages name. How about "Baland", the land of the many Ba Peoples, Ba-kossi, Ba-melike, Ba-ngwa, Ba-kweri, .... ? Yet for now, the Ambazonian diaspora can get expertise from the UN and Norway on how to regain control over its resources and territory and transform oil into wealth, as well as from all BRIC countries on how to open the Ambazonia National Bank and issue a new currency by attracting its futures to foreign investors, and to force France / Switzerland this way to send Biya into permanent exile retirement and bring him before International Court for his human rights violations and embezzlements. Don't hesitate, just do it! Overcome intertribal ditchfights before your common enemy and start teamworking! Elect your new own Government NOW!
INTERIM GOVERNMENT NOW..WHILE MOMENTUM LAST.....
There has been a lot of arguerment against an interim government now, some say its too soon.Some say we need this and that to have a government ,otherwise it will die like former interim governments we have had. Well, I happened to be blesses to have lived through them all. Permit me to say that none of the other cases is like this one. First, we are much more matured now than we were then. Secondly, the new found unity between southern Cameroonian children from SW and NW, and from every county therein was problematic at that time. In fact , it was a bargaining chip for la republic, and they used it effectively .Today that unity is la republic's worse night mare.Thirdly, the backinking of Abazonian children in the diaspora was none existence. These are the hard facts that currently play to our advantage and we are slow to capitalize on them before its too late. While I agree that,It is important for us to have a host country, I find it hard to believe that up to this point of the struggle Boh Herbert and company have not been able to talk Ghana,or Rowan DA or someone like Gambia to host us. I do not believe it. Boh Herbert , tell us some thing please we are loosing momentum and la republic is capitalizing on that.
Finally, my dear people, if we are truely Abazonians, then we must be selfless. And if we are selfless, it is very simple to get an interim PM to lead us to BUEA.This is how:All organisations that have identified with SCACUF and the Way Foward should meet in a conclave and chose a PM from among themselves.Or they all agree to chose someone from outside who is knowledgeable such as Dr. Carlson Anyengwe, Dr. Ndiva Koffele Kale, and the give a portfolio to every organisation in the conclave for the twelve ministries we need.For example Dr. Cho Ayaba with his block by block should be minister of defence, Boh Herbert, Information and External Relations.etc. We are being complicated for nothing while we are loosing our grip on the la république.

Monday, May 1, 2017

Nigeria Takes Interest In The Southern Cameroons Problem by Dr Amos O Enabulele, Chairman



Nigeria Takes Interest In The Southern Cameroons Problem
The Situation in Southern Cameroon: A Call for a Halt to Human Rights Repressions
The ILA (Nigeria) Committee on Justice and Human Rights, acting under the protective mandate of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, is concerned over the ongoing events in the Republic of Cameroon and has considered it imperative to add its voice to the variously expressed opposition to the wanton violation of the rights of the people of English speaking Provinces of Cameroon by the Government of the Republic of Cameroon.
The facts upon which the intervention of the Committee is established, as verified by CNN, Amnesty International and the African Bar Association, are as follow:
I. That residents of Cameroon's two English-speaking provinces have longstanding grievances against the largely-francophone central government, complaining of economic marginalization and the imposition of French legal and education systems upon them;
II. That in November and December 2016, Anglophone lawyers led protests against the use of French in courts, resulting in clashes with police in which protesters were killed;
III. That the Cameroon Anglophone Civil Society Consortium (CACSC) and Southern Cameroons National Council (SCNC), responded with series of strikes and "Operation Ghost Town" – a form of nonviolent resistance that requiring all supporters to stay at home;
IV. That following the strikes, schools and courts in the Anglophone regions of Cameroon have been shut since November 2016;
V. That on January 17, the government banned the CACSC and the SCNC, holding them responsible for the protests. The CACSC President Nkongho Felix Agbor-Balla and Secretary General Dr. Fontem Neba were arrested on charges relating to terrorism, and are yet to regain their freedom and have not been offered all the necessary facilities for fair and impartial trial.
Being aware that the issues leading to the current impasse are not new, the Committee takes cognisance of the following:
(a) that the current situation is intimately linked to the events that occurred in British Southern Cameroon in the context of decolonisation having its root in the League of Nations Mandate System that partitioned Cameroon between Great Britain and France and which culminated in the plebiscite of the United Nations on Southern and Northern Cameroon independence question;
(b) That matters arising from the plebiscite have been a subject of litigation and discussion at several international forums, particularly, at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the African Commission on Human and Peoples;
(c) That the Committee is aware that the facts presented to the African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights on the Southern Cameroon (‘Ambazonia’) in the case of Gorji-Dinka v Cameroon (2005) AHRLR 18 (HRC 2005), particularly, paragraphs 2.1 to 3.2, were unchallenged by the government of Cameroon;
(d) The Committee also takes cognisance of Kevin Mgwanga Gunme et al v Cameroon (communication 266/03) in which, after it had painstakingly considered the position of both parties, the African Commission made the following findings:
· On the facts presented that Cameroon’s law enforcement officers were employing torture, amputations and denial of medical treatment to suppress the Southern Cameroon question, against the claim of government of Cameroon that the agitators had perpetrated terrorist acts in the country, the Commission found Cameroon liable, emphasising that the methods employed by Cameroon were unjustified;
· On the imposition of French on the Anglophone regions, the Commission found that it was wrong for institutions, such as banks to force Southern Cameroon based companies to change their basic documents into French in violation of Article 2 of the African Charter;
· On the failure of Cameroon to guarantee fair trial to the Anglophone activists, the Commission found Cameroon in violation, for:
- transferring individuals from Southern Cameroon to Francophone Cameroon for trial by military tribunals,
- denying interpreters to those tried in civil law courts;
· The Commission found (concerning the individuals that were tried in French without the help of interpreters) that, having denied them the opportunity to adequately prepare their defence, Cameroon violated articles 7.1.b, 7.1.c and 7.1.d of the Charter.
· The Commission was categorical in finding that the tendency of military tribunals is to act as an extension of the executive, rather than the judiciary, and that they are not intended to try civilians but to try military personnel under laws and regulations which govern the military. The Commission finds that trying civilians by the Yaoundé and the Bafoussam Military Tribunals was a violation of the right to fair hearing;
· The facts before the Commission showed cases of suppression of demonstrations with excessive force as well as the unlawful arrest and detention of protesters, peaceably exercising their right to freedom of assembly. The Commission found that some of the detained persons were acquitted while some died at the hands of security forces or in detention. The Commission found Cameroon in violation of article 11 of the African Charter.
· The Commission also condemned the relocation of business enterprises and location of economic projects to Francophone Cameroon, which generated negative effects on the economic life of Southern Cameroon as a violation of article 19 of the Charter.
(e) Having carefully considered the similarities of behaviour of the government of Cameroon that gave rise to the aforementioned cases to those now being employed by the government (and which show that Cameroon failed to implement the recommendations of the Commission), it is the view of this Committee that for their currency and relevance to the presence situation, fitting to adopt and reiterate the recommendations and to strongly urge the Cameroonian government to take all necessary steps to implement the findings as an important step towards the resolution of the historic Southern Cameroon question.
(f) Accordingly, we call on the government of Cameroon to, among others:
· release forthwith all those who are currently detained or are being tried for and in respect of matters arising from the southern Cameroon question;
· commence a process of national dialogue and payment of compensation to all individuals whose rights have been violated by the unwarranted use of force by the government of Cameroon against the people of Anglophone regions of Cameroon.
· address the grievances expressed by the English speaking Provinces of Cameroon through its democratic institutions. The 1993 Buea and 1994 Bamenda Anglophone conferences raised constitutional and human rights issues which have been a matter of concern to a sizable section of the Anglophone Regions of Cameroon for quite a long time;
· immediately begin sincere, inclusive and purposive process of consultations towards the amendment of 1995 Constitution of the Republic of Cameroon to address the demands of the Anglophone Regions of Cameroon, particularly since it did not accommodate the concerns expressed through the 1993 Buea Declaration and 1994 Bamenda Proclamation;
abolish all discriminatory practices against people of Southern Cameroon, including equal usage of the English language in business transactions;
stop the transfer of accused persons from the Anglophone provinces for trial in the Francophone provinces;
ensure that every person facing criminal charges be tried under the language he/she understands;
locate national projects, equitably throughout the country in accordance with economic viability as well as regional balance;
enter into constructive dialogue with the Anglophone Regions of Cameroon, and in particular, CACSC and the SCNC, to resolve the constitutional issues, as well as grievances which could threaten national unity; and
to carry out judicial reform towards guaranteeing the independence and impartiality of the judiciary.That the Southern Cameroonians’ should cooperate with sincere and meaningful attempts by the government to resolve their grievances by constitutional means.
Dr Amos O Enabulele,
Chairman
ILA (Nig) Committee on Justice & Human Rights

”BUSINESSMEN WHO CLOSE SHOPS ON GHOST TOWN DAYS ARE EXTREMISTS” EKEMA PATRICK.

It’s a furious mayor who spoke today on Equinox TV. Ekema Patrick of Buea was not just surprise but was shocked on how people of his municipality respected ghost town. Ekema said ….
“Businessmen who closed shops on ghost town days are extremists”.




The disappointed Mayor who thought everything was going on normally since the internet blockade went on to express his disappointment on the South West Elites, which he said, they have done nothing to restore calm in Buea.

Anglophone Crisis: Moody & Fitch to Slash Cameroun Credit Rating by Eric Acha

Anglophone Crisis: Moody & Fitch to Slash Cameroun Credit Rating


Besides the diplomatic pressure being mounted on Cameroon with regards the political (Anglophone) crisis rocking the country, there is a less talked-about pressure which is, even more pinching and hurting than the diplomatic pressure.
Should this crisis continue, Cameroon risk seeing its credit rating slashed by Moody & Fitch in the coming months. The two credit rating agencies who recently rated Cameroon as B2 & B respectively already highlighted structural weaknesses (in other words; governance and political risks) as major concerns prior to the last ratings.


Meaning should the political crisis get any worse, Cameroon’s rating could be slashed, making it difficult for Cameroon to raise funds from the financial market.
To note how important this sector is, in 2015, the country raised $750 million through the sale of securities due in November 2025 at 9.75 percent. Most of the money is reported to have gone towards public spending.
Cameroon has also significantly increased it’s bilateral borrowing from China, the go-to place when pressed by the wild west. (68% of all bilateral debt). It has also been borrowing nationally at an increasing rate to finance its arrears and one of the country’s biggest national creditor is SONARA.
As of today, the country public debt stands at $18 636 130 339 (FCFA 11,213,637,499,532.60 frs). What this means is that, of the estimated population of
c.a 25million, each and every Cameroonian owes an average of $763 (FCFA 459,241.94 frs). This is Cameroon’s total national debt per capita.


These are figures the Yaounde regime will do everything to conceal from the struggling population. We are being rubbed and at the same time indebted in broad daylight.
Stay home tomorrow May 1st and meditate over these figures if you care about this country. There is nothing to celebrate for.
Be a conscious citizen.
Anyway, it’s a natural contri Sunday
The struggle continues.
Eric Acha

Francophone Bishops Fail Anglophone Bishops by Chief Charles A. Taku


Barrister Chief Charles A.Taku reacts to Bishops of Cameroun letter :
There is a letter in circulation from the Catholic Bishops of Cameroon signed by the Arch Bishop of Douala. This is a second letter written by the Bishops of Cameroon. Like the first letter, this letter fails to clearly identify the problem the writers purport to be concerned about. I find the use of contentious slogans like safeguard of “unite nationale” and similar language which Isa Tchiroma has consistently used in relation to the subject matter of the Bishop’s letter troubling.


The good news is that the Bishops of the Ecclesiastical Province of Bamenda came out with a comprehensive letter that dispassionately identified the profound causes of the crisis and made attainable reasonable proposals for comprehensive dialogue for the resolution to the crisis. Significant national and international actors have since endorsed the proposal of a comprehensive dialogue to resolve the crisis made by the Bishops of the Ecclesiastical Province of Bamenda. From the late palliatives announced by the government, it is obvious that some of the proposals made by the Bishops of the Ecclesiastical Province of Bamenda might have influenced governmental action; at least too little, too late. It is discernible from an anxious reading of the first letter of the Bishops of Cameroon, that of the Bishops of the Ecclesiastical Province of Bamenda and the present letter of the Bishops of Cameroon that the latest letter of the Bishops of Cameroon is actuated by political rather than Christian motivations.
The Christian value of their letters is mitigated by the vacuous content on details and rigour in confronting the truth that the Gospel of the Cross teaches. Their peers in the Bamenda Ecclesiastical Province and a significant number of clerics from many denominations have contemporaneously denounced the ongoing egregious violations on armless citizens, the politicisation of military justice, the genocide, the cultural genocide and several international crimes that have shocked the conscience of humanity in the territory of the Southern Cameroons. These late and timid reactions exposes these prelates as shepherds that abandoned the flock in time of need. I find their timid condemnation of the frivolous and vexatious cases against the Bishop and Church of the Ecclesiastical Province of Bamenda and the religious leaders of other Christian Churches surprising and unjustified. There are discernible attempts made by the Bishops of Cameroon in their two letters to impute some form of blame on Southern Cameroons civilian victims for articulating their grievances through peaceful and legal means guaranteed by multilateral treaties which Cameroon is state party. By omission or by practicing the gospel of Pontius Pilate, they may by default be emboldening and strengthening the hand of tyranny.


Their unfortunate ploy to balance their cursory concerns of the legally and morally unjustified use of excessive force by state actors who are bound by the Geneva Conventions (1949) to respect the sanctity of civilian lives, avoid actions in their deployments that will harm civilians and civilian targets is regrettable. If the actions of these prelates is intended to secure a place for them in a future comprehensive dialogue to resolve the crisis, I am afraid, they have overplayed their relevance. The crisis concerns the Ecclesiastical Province of Bamenda. The Bishops of this Ecclesiastical Province have spoken and we have taken note. Along with the Church, they are presently persecuted by proxy using senior members of the military who by military discipline will not form or be members of activist civil society associations. The bastardisation of the educational system harms Catholic education and the social teachings of the Church. The question, I must ask, who stands to gain from these crimes? And who stands to gain from the persecution of the prelates and church leaders? The spiritual underpinnings of these actions and the ruthless attempts to control, dominate and terrorize every person and institution that stand on the path of those who hope to eternalize power by mystical spiritual means are in the public domain. Some call it spiritual warfare. We Christians are ready and prepared for this phase of the battle as well. This is therefore a time for a profound critical recommitment to our Christian faith and to the tenets of freedom and justice.
As a Catholic Christian, I strongly urge the Bishops of Cameroon to advice the government of Cameroon to critically read the letter of the Bishops of the Ecclesiastical Province of Bamenda in which they confronted the truth with biblical inspiration and the faith in the Christian values.
For this reason, they letters are unnecessary and unwarranted.
Chief Charles A. Taku