Monday, January 29, 2018

"Shithole" Propagandist Pro-Colonialist Media Organs!!! Useless, Miserable, Lying Media - TV5, France24 Worst of all CRTV

Shithole Propagandist Pro-Colonialist Media Organs!!! 

Useless, Miserable, Lying Media - TV5, France24 Worst of all CRTV

 

We are not handing over detained “Ambazonian” Leaders to Cameroon, said Nigeria to UNHCR (READ FULL TEXT)


In a release by the United Nations High Commission for Refugees UNHCR dated 24th January 2018, the Government of Nigeria is promising the United Nations that they will under no circumstances hand over the arrested Leaders of “Ambazonia” to the Government of Cameroon. This highly contradicts recent claims by France 24 and TV5 Monde that Sisiku Ayuk Tabe and other close collaborators were in fact extradited to Yaounde in the early hours of last Friday.

Let us better read the TRUTH below and forward till it reaches them, that the world has heard their empty headed utterances, and pro-colonialist agendas.

We feel sorry for those "shithole" media organs for the disgraceful role they have played in Africa not only in Cameroon, but which over the years have been involved in deceit, maneovring the masses of Africa, maintaining shameless dictators in power and making their agendas prevail over the people over whom they have lost legitimacy. 
These organs had better watched out, for the spy and misinformation agendas of France over Africa. This is just one in a myriad of meddling agendas in the African continent...


Saturday, January 27, 2018

QUESTIONS FOR TCHIROMA, By Atemnkeng

QUESTIONS FOR TCHIROMA, 

LA REPUBLIQUE DU CAMEROUN (LRC) MINISTER OF COMMUNICATION, AND LRC ITSELF





1. What makes you think that Ambazonians should not rule themselves within their own internationally defined territory?
2. If LRC claims the right to govern itself within its own territory, why should Ambazonians not govern themselves within their own territory?
3. Is there anyone or any people, including LRC, who can claim a greater right to the territory and resources of the Southern Cameroons than the people of the Southern Cameroons themselves?
4. African tribes and human beings all over the world have often gone to war to defend their territory. Why do you think Ambazonians should not defend their own? Are Ambazonians right to defend their territory against the imperialism of LRC? Or is LRC right to claim the territory of Ambazonia?
5. You allege that Ambazonia is a part of La Republique du Cameroun. Do you have any treaty of Union or any instrument of Union between Ambazonia and La Republique du Cameroun (LRC)? Can you show the world that instrument?
6. Ambazonians are not contesting the territory of LRC, why is LRC contesting the territory of Ambazonia?
7. Cameroun quotes the fact that the Southern Cameroons (Ambazonia) and LRC were formerly parts of one German Kamerun. Yes, that is right. Who gave LRC the purported right to inherit the former territories of German Kamerun? Under what law is LRC pretending to do that? There are currently parts of German Kamerun in Nigeria, in Chad, in Central African Republic. Why is LRC not claiming those parts? France and Britain were parts of one Roman Empire. Should Britain claim the territory of France or France claim the territory of Britain on that account? Should Rwanda claim Burundi because they were formerly one country? Is Cameroun’s argument not a betrayal of its imperialism? Who said that territories that formerly belonged to one country or imperial power cannot become separate countries? The Soviet Union has become several countries; so has former Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Sudan, etc. How can LRC justify its colonial ambitions?
8. Cameroun has often also quoted the UN-organised plebiscite of 1961 as the alleged source of the purported union. Was Cameroon a party to the Plebiscite? How could a response made to a question posed by the UN to the people of the Southern Cameroons become some kind of contract with LRC? Was the Plebiscite an act by which the territory of the Southern Cameroons and its people were surrendered to LRC or made a free gift to it? Was the Plebiscite not about Southern Cameroons’ independence and only secondarily joining with LRC? How is it that Cameroun is interpreting the Plebiscite as the act by which it got possession of the Southern Cameroons or by which a free gift was made of the people of the Southern Cameroons and their territory to Cameroun?
9. If the plebiscite was about Southern Cameroons independence, which the UN actually followed up and voted overwhelmingly to grant in Res. 1608(XV), where is the independence today?
10. Even, grant the Plebiscite (which we do not), should the territory of the Southern Cameroons become that of LRC? Is Cameroun not using the Plebiscite only as a ploy to colonise and annex the Southern Cameroons? When did the people of the Southern Cameroons cede their territory and life to LRC?
11. You claim the existence of a union between Ambazonia and LRC, where are the instruments of union? What are the terms of your alleged union? Do you admit that only the relation between a master and slave has no terms?
12. Cameroun in one breath claims there was a union; then in another claims that Ambazonians have no right to speak of their own state which purportedly joined LRC; it denies the people of Ambazonia the right to question the fate of their own state in the pretended Union; it takes all steps to delete from the memory of the people of Ambazonia everything about their own state and history; it imposes its own language on the people of Ambazonia; it refuses to accept English as the official language in Ambazonia; it jails all Ambazonians who question the jurisdiction of LRC within Ambazonia. Do all these evils not continually prove beyond all doubts that LRC now treats Ambazonia and its people as a colony? That it has annexed and subjugated Ambazonia?
13. If LRC alleges a union, why does it refuse the people of Ambazonia from speaking as the other party to the Union you claim to exist? Should Ambazonians not be able to speak as the other party to the alleged union? Can you allege a union and at the same time claim that only LRC has the right to decide everything and to own everything in the so-called union?
14. What will you call an alleged union in which the other party is denied the right to speak, to assemble, to withdraw, to question anything about the union; in which there are no terms and no treaty of union; in which one of the parties has no rights; in which one party confiscates the territory of the other and has the right of life and death over the other? How is such a so-called union different from imperialism, colonisation and annexation?
15. Can you cite one single article of the AU Constitutive Act or the UN Charter which gives LRC jurisdiction over Ambazonian territory?
16. The principle is firmly established in international law that the boundaries of every state are confined to the boundaries it inherited on its day of independence (Art. 4(b) of the African Union Constitutive Act). Should this principle apply to the boundaries of LRC?
17. There is an international boundary that separates the territory of Ambazonia from the territory of LRC. That boundary was established between France, whose territory LRC inherited and Britain, whose territory the Southern Cameroons inherited. France never contested the boundary, why should LRC contest it? Is there any other treaty that has changed that boundary?
18. LRC has been speaking without citing a single principle of international law which gives it jurisdiction over the Southern Cameroons territory. Ambazonians base all their arguments on the principles of international law, especially the AU Constitutive Act, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the UN Charter. Why has Cameroun been unable, even once, to cite one single principle to substantiate its claims?
19. Is Cameroun willing to accept dialogue based on international law or under international auspices? Or is Cameroun so terrified of the truth that it wants to continue to live through the gun and propaganda alone? Is this not armed robbery?
20. Your former President, Ahidjo, repeatedly vowed to the UN that Cameroun was not annexationist and would not use its size to annex the Southern Cameroons. Why has Cameroun annexed the Southern Cameroons? If you deny annexation, how then has a state which had its own Prime Minister, Civil Service, state institutions, suddenly ceased to exist?
21. Are you aware that Res. 1608(XV) of 21 April 1961 whose implementation would have led to a valid legal union between the Southern Cameroons and LRC was never implemented?
22. Are you aware that LRC voted against union with the Southern Cameroons in Res. 1608(XV) of 21 April 1961?
23. Are you aware that according to Article 102(1) of the UN Charter any alleged union between a member of the UN and another territory or any alleged treaty whatsoever that is not reduced into writing and filed at the UN Secretariat is null and void?
24. Don’t you realize that the methods LRC is using today against Ambazonians: those of violence, killings, abductions, terror, rape, intimidation, torture, burning of homes and mass killings have failed very where, including even in Nazi Germany? What makes you think that they will succeed because Cameroun is using them when they have never succeeded anywhere?
25. We have heard so much from the Cameroun government telling the world that only a small fraction of Ambazonians want independence; that the majority want to stay with Cameroun. What makes Cameroun believe that it has the right to speak for Ambazonians? Is Cameroun willing to accept a referendum organized and supervised by the United Nations to determine what the people of Ambazonia want? Is the fact that Cameroun is purporting to speak for Ambazonians more proof of its subjugation of the people of AMBAZONIA?

By Atemnkeng

ALL AMBAZONIANS, LETS READ THIS FOR OUR ENCOURAGEMENT





Dear friends, there's a very important piece of history I'll like to share with you which concerns you.

On December 1, 1955, a middle-aged "negro woman" in America, Mrs. Rosa Parks, refused to stand up for a young white man who just entered the segregated bus she was ridding in. If she did, she would have had to stand all through the journey. 

At that time, the bus is segregated in most parts of America: white people sit in front rows and black people sit from the back. Blacks would normally pay fare to the driver in the front, then step out of the bus and go through the back door to find a place in an already tight area at the back. If the allocated spaces for blacks are filled, all other blacks joining the bus would have to stand even when the more than half of the bus spaces reserved for whites are empty! Such was the injustice and humiliation that black Americans faced then.

For refusing to stand up for the young white man, Mrs Rosa Parks was immediately arrested, scheduled for prosecution on Monday December 5. Then the Rev. Martins Luther King and his NAACP comrades stepped in. They called out the people. They spoke about the sad realities of their existence, the terror of an unjust system and barbaric treatments in the hands of fellow Americans. 

In addition to speaking out, these Black Americans decided to take action to protest that injustice by boycotting the segregated buses. The boycott began December 6, 1955.

Dear friends, here is the crux of the matter: Black Americans took action! For 1 year and 16 days, *they trekked to and from work or boarded improvised pooled taxes, everyday*, until the US supreme courts declared segregation unconstitutional! 

During the struggle, someone offered one tired black woman a lift in his pool car, but she declined, saying, *"l ain't trekking for myself, but for my children and grandchildren "*!

So, dear friends, whenever we don’t take action and we feel unobligated, unconcerned,* we should simply remember the black Americans and those women. Without them, the freedom that US enjoys today wouldn't have happened, or happened too late.

Obama may not have become the President of US.

So, the questions before all of us now are: Are we live slaves to LRC? Are you ready to trek for yourself and your generation yet unborn as the black Americans did? Are we willing to do our own little bits to liberate ourselves, children and future generations and the Republic of Ambazonia from colonialism,bondage,slavery,servitude, etc? Are we ready to act? 

If the answers are in the affirmative, then the time to act is now.Let's all raise as one man and fight LRC till total liberation. God is with us.


A LUTA CONTINUA,VICTORIA ASCERTA.

"Biya cannot survive this thing" by Jonathan Awasom




The government cannot win with war and massacre and soon, I will be changing my song from dialogue to referendum, you wanna know why,  
Read this inspiring piece reflecting on Tchiroma interview yesterday, must read 
Shared as received 

I still believe that the referendum must happen because there is no other way the UN will resolve the issue. 

With the growing refugee crisis and continuous attacks , destruction of homes and lives , a severe humanitarian crisis is in the making and self interest of nations will crystallize soon when their investments are obviously at risk now. Political instability is the worst nightmare of foreign investors no matter who. So, they are already becoming uncomfortable because they thought Biya would resolve or contain the crisis. 

That means they will soon have to succumb to the people and not to the regime. That is why I suggested that the people should not be silent over the burning down of their homes and the carnage.

Biya cannot survive this thing in the long term and the same international bodies are only interested in their long term interests in that region with geopolitical implications 

They want stability and right now there is no stability ,which means this war can drag on for a while since neither Biya nor the ambazonian fighters are giving up. Someone has to stop attacking the other but the Biya's regime are to blame for killing, arresting and locking up anglophones since December 2016 simply because of a peotest against marginalization.

There is no guarantee that both sides might be armed by the international bodies but based on the power of negotiation, diplomacy and perhaps fate, I think anglophones will prevail. Truth is key to all these. I cannot understand a regime can hate a people whom you want to have a continuous union with ? 

They will fail because of the historical context of referendum which Biya's minister of miscommunication alluded to and misspoke to begin with during an interview yesterday. 

He said that the UN conducted a referendum in 1961 which resulted into the present attachement/ union. As shortsighted as he is, he failed to state that there was another referendum in 1972 that was not sanctioned by the UN. That is the one ,which i am contesting because why did LRC conduct another referendum in 1972 undermining the authority and jurisdiction of the UN under international law? 

So, if they see him and his government as a problem and not a solution, they will abandon him. The basis of this is the unity of anglophones and respect for due process . That is why I stand for referendum because the situation requires three possible solutions . 

1. Either UN simply declares that the 20th May 1972 referendum orchestrated by LRC was illegal and then reinstate the former two states federation neccessitated by UN resolution 1608(5) of April 21st 1961 or 

2. The UN simply bows to our request for another referendum to give everyone the opportunity to vote on YES or NO. That means all anglophones no matter where you stand will vote and afterwards we will comply with the outcome. To me referendum is the platform of dialogue moving forward because it is an international recognized instrument for peaceful resolution of such political crisis . Besides , we are not foreign to the idea based on history. 

3. The next question is how will the referendum be conducted or how will that happen and who will authorize it ? 

To be continued 


Jonathan Awasom

Friday, January 12, 2018

*CAN THE AMBAZONIA LEADERS BE EXTRADITED?* by Dr. Mbeli Valentine Tebi, *Courtesy BA SAMA II.*



A MUST READ BY LAWYERS*. 

*Please take a time and read this post from Dr. Mbeli Valentine Tebi. He holds a PhD in law from Nigeria and is currently the dean of the faculty of law in a Ugandan university*. 

He explains the worries most of us have on the arrest of the leaders of Ambazonia. 

*CAN THE AMBAZONIA LEADERS BE EXTRADITED?*

*INTRODUCTION*

A few days ago i wrote on the arrest of the leaders of the Federal Republic of Ambazonia by the Nigerian authorities apparently at the behest of the Cameroonian authorities. In that write-up i dwelt more on the socio-political dimensions of the arrest and how possibly it will play out. 
In this piece, i intend to engage some topical legal issues relating to extradition in particular of whether those arrested are extraditable. 

*WHAT IS EXTRADITION?*

For purposes of this article, i will like to adopt the definition of the Nigerian Court of Appeal in George Udeozor v Federal Republic of Nigeria, where it defined extradition as "the process of returning somebody, upon request, accused of a crime by a different legal authority to the requesting authority
for trial or punishment". In other words, extradition is a legal process where one jurisdiction known as the requested state is made to deliver to another jurisdiction known as a requesting state, a person or persons accused or convicted of crime in the requesting jurisdiction. Such a person or persons are therefore returned to face trial or serve any punishment validly handed down by a court of competent jurisdiction in the requesting state. 

*LAWS GOVERNING EXTRADITION*
 
As a rule of international law, extradition is not automatic i.e. there is no obligation on states to extradite suspects or offenders to other sovereign states. To that extent, extradition is largely regulated by conventional international law through the instrument of treaties. This rule however operates subject to an exception as we shall see subsequently.

 Even where there exists an extradition treaty allowing a sovereign state to arrest and deliver a fugitive to another state to stand trial of serve a punishment, there is an explicit legal procedure that must be followed. This procedure is espoused in the relevant statutory instruments. A key point to note is that extradition is not simply an arrest and handover process. It has to go through the rigorous process of court adjudication where an application to that effect may either be granted or rejected. A decision not favourable to any party to an extradition suit may equally be appealed through the relevant appellate channels to the Court of Appeal and eventually to the Supreme Court. 

That having said, it is important to address the question as to the applicable law in extradition cases. Where there exist a valid extradition treaty between two sovereigns, and a request has been duly made by the requesting state, the matter has to be submitted to the jurisdiction of the requested state in which case the applicable law is that of the requested state. 

Assuming without conceding that a request has been duly made by Cameroon to Nigeria to arrest and deliver the leaders of the Federal Republic of Ambazonia, it will follow from the foregoing analysis that the applicable law will be that of Nigeria.

In Nigeria, there is a plethora of statutory instruments governing extradition proceedings. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as amended lays down a broad legal framework which vest exclusive jurisdiction to hear extradition matters in the Federal High Court. The constitutional framework is operationalised by a number of legislative and regulatory instruments, notably, the Extradition Act and the Federal High Court (Extradition Proceedings) Rules 2015. 

*REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTRADITION*

It has already been mentioned that the existence of a valid extradition treaty is condition sine qua non for extradition to take place. This stems from the fact that there is no obligation under international law to extradite. It equally resonates with the rule of international law that parties to a particular treaty should be bound by their agreement (pacta sunt servanda).

Following this principle, the court in George Udeozor v.Federal Republic of Nigeria, held that "the right of one State (country in the present circumstance), to request of another, the extradition of a fugitive accused of crime, and the duty of the country in which the fugitive finds asylum to surrender the said fugitive, exist only when created by a treaty"
Riding on the principle of law and the decision of court cited above, it may easily lead to the conclusion that the Nigerian Court will be in want of jurisdiction to grant an extradition order for the simple fact that there is no extradition treaty between Nigeria and Cameroon. 
However, it does not end there. There is indeed a leeway which the government of Cameroon may likely exploit. This comes from the categorisation of states under the Nigerian Extradition Act. Aside the general rule that the Extradition Act is only applicable to a State that has an extradition treaty with Nigeria, the Act, by way of exception makes special recognition of Commonwealth states under section 2 (1) in that that the Act is applicable to “every separate country within the Commonwealth" The necessary implication here is that in the absence of an extradition treaty, extradition proceedings are still maintainable having regards to section 2(1) of the Extradition Act. This is similar to the common law principle of rendition. 

But still this does not come cheaply as the court is bound to take into consideration all material facts and principles of law relevant to extradition. While it is clear on the face of it that Cameroon can make an extradition request to Nigeria on the strength of its membership of the Commonwealth as guaranteed under section 2(1) of the Extradition Act, it remains arguable whether the Attorney General of Nigeria can successfully initiate and secure the granting or an extradition order by the Federal High Court. This takes us to the procedure for extradition under Nigerian law.

*PROCEDURE FOR EXTRADITION*
 
Attention must be brought to the fact that an extradition proceedings is in many ways similar to any other court proceedings with the parties relying on all relevant facts and the court guided by the rules of evidence in particular of relevancy and admissibility. 
The procedure for extradition starts with a request for the surrender of a fugitive criminal, made in writing to the Attorney-General of the Federation of Nigeria. The request is made by a diplomatic representative or consular officer of the country making the extradition request. Upon receiving the request, the Attorney-General has the discretion as to whether or not to initiate extradition proceedings. The discretion of the Attorney-General means he cannot be compelled by order of mandamus or otherwise to initiate extradition proceedings where he has exercised the discretion to not proceed. 

Where the Attorney General opts to initiate extradition proceedings, he makes a substantive application to the Federal High Court alongside the relevant supporting documents as required by the Federal High Court (Extradition Proceedings) Rules. On the basis of the application, an extradition hearing is then slated with the A.G first addressing the Court and arguing for the surrender of the fugitive to the requesting state. Where the court makes an order for the extradition of the fugitive then he may be surrendered after the time stipulated by the order.

WHAT ARE THE POSSIBLE

 *DEFENCES AGAINST THE EXTRADITION REQUEST OF CAMEROON AGAINST THE AMBAZONIA LEADERS?*

Should it turn out that the Attorney General of the Federal Republic of Nigeria decides to make a substantive application to the Federal High Court for an extradition order against the leaders of the Federal Republic of Ambazonia, this will be a fiercely contested legal battle where the standard of proof must be beyond all reasonable doubts. Here are some possible line of defences that may be explored by Counsel to the respondent. 
Failure to convince the court that the application for extradition order is incompetent for want of an extradition treaty between Nigeria and Cameroon, Counsel may proceed to argue that the offences alleged to have been committed by the leaders are not extraditable offences. This can successfully be argued within the ambit of the Nigerian law. 

1.) It is trite law that an extradition order will not been granted where it is aimed at prosecuting or punishing the fugitive on account of the fugitive’s race, religion, nationality or political opinions. See Section 3(2) (a) Extradition Act. Political offences are clearly not extraditable. According to United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Country Office Nigeria these offences are "acts or conducts that are directed against government or sovereign authorities of state without elements of common crime. These crimes violate the State and not any individual person". Examples of political offences have been given by Kenelly J.J. to include: treason, sedition, espionage and to a large extent disagreement with state ideology. The crimes alleged to have been committed by the Ambazonian leaders by all descriptions fit the notion of political crimes which as earlier indicated, are not extraditable.
2.) The likelihood of an unfair trial in the requesting country. The idea behind extradition is not to try the accused for alleged crime but to ensure that the fugitive is delivered to face trial under the relevant penal laws of the requesting country. Although rules of private international law forbid the application of foreign penal laws in Nigeria, the Nigerian court must however take cognizance of the basic rules of criminal procedure, in particular of the right to fair hearing. Therefore even where the offence committed by the fugitive is not political and is otherwise extraditable, an extradition request will nonetheless be rejected if the fugitive offender is likely to be prejudiced at his trial, or to be punished, detained or restricted in his personal liberty, by reason of his race, religion, nationality or political opinions. If the Attorney General makes a request for extradition and the fugitive will be subjected to an unfair trial or unlawful discrimination in the requesting State, the fugitive may prove the relevant facts to the notice of the Judge. A clear case of impermissible unfairness that is likely to result from the extradition of those arrested and which the Nigerian court must remain alive to is the fact that the said offences are to be tried by a military tribunal in clear violation of the fundamental rule of criminal justice which forbids the trial of civilians in military court. Under the United Nations Model Treaty on Extradition, it is a mandatory ground for refusing extradition if the offence for which extradition is requested is an offence under military law. 
3.) Torture. The Nigerian Court will not grant an extradition order where there is incontrovertible evidence to show that the fugitive criminal will be exposed to torture by the requesting state. This is because Nigeria is a party to the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Article 3 of the Convention expressly prohibits state parties from expelling, returning “refouler”, or extraditing any person to a state where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture. Evidence gathered from the Maximum Security Prison in Yaounde, the cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment administered on prisoners, and most especially those hidden in BUNKERS can all attest to an eminent danger of torture. It fact, there is informed public opinion that a release of the leaders of Ambazonia will mean releasing for execution and nothing less. The is a strong point which the court can rely on to dismiss any application for an extradition order.  
In summation, the Ambazonian leaders stand a good chance of challenging the the request for their extradition by the Federal Government of Nigeria to Cameroon.

*JUST TO INCREASE THE LEGAL KNOWLEDGE OF LAWYERS ON EXTRADITION LAW.* 

 *Courtesy BA SAMA II.*


Britain has a responsibility to put pressure on Paul Biya’s government by Jackie Fearnley



Jackie Fearnley writes about the desperate plight of the Southern Cameroons and says Britain has a responsibility to put pressure on Paul Biya’s government
 President Paul Biya of Cameroon
 President Paul Biya of Cameroon. Photograph: Carlo Allegri/Reuters


Letters

Sun 7 Jan ‘18 19.16 GMT Last modified on Sun 7 Jan ‘18 22.00 GMT
 View more sharing options
Shares
295


I’d like to draw attention to the plight of political prisoners in Cameroon (Cameroon split as anglophones call for creation of ‘Ambazonia’, 3 January). I am in touch with some of those enduring horrible conditions in the notorious, severely overcrowded prison of Kondengui, many of whom have been there for over a year. Every few weeks they are brought before a military tribunal (which can impose the death penalty) but each time they appear, no witnesses are present and no case is brought. Some of them will appear again on 19 January and they are appealing for journalists and human rights organisations to be present to witness this cruel charade. They would like pressure to be brought on the government of Paul Biya to end this inhumane treatment of protesters. While there are so many in prison, and others unaccounted for, there can’t even be any thoughts of dialogue, nor can the thousands of people forced to flee to Nigeria come back while they have no assurance of safety.

Since decolonisation there have been two plebiscites: the first when the ex-British Southern Cameroons were offered only the choice of joining La République du Cameroun in a federation or of becoming part of Nigeria, then a second vote 10 years later when they were asked if they would like to become part of a unitary state (thus losing the federated status and their star on the flag), and were apparently offered the choice of oui or yes (ie no choice).

France, Britain and the UN must bear some responsibility for this unfortunate marriage which has failed so disastrously. Promises of fair and equal treatment have not been kept and Cameroon is a state that is bilingual only in name. Any activity seen as threatening the power of Paul Biya is punished with detention (usually without trial) and brutal treatment, as witnessed by the numbers of Southern Cameroonians who come to claim asylum here and are accepted as clients by Freedom from Torture.

It is high time that the Southern Cameroonians, who have been recognised as a people by the UN, were rescued from injustice, social and economic marginalisation, persecution and the misappropriation of their resources and at long last given a voice. Instead of standing helplessly by and watching the escalation of a genocide, perhaps a helpful step would be if Great Britain could initiate a resolution for a referendum to be conducted through the good offices of the UN with questions to ascertain how many anglophones from NW and SW Cameroon would like to remain in this union, how many would like a true federation (of respected equals) and how many would like complete independence. Another relevant action might be to make it known that Cameroon risks being expelled from the Commonwealth for failing to respect the rule of law, observation of which is a basic requirement for membership.
Jackie Fearnley

York

The African Bar Association is CATEGORICAL on the Nigeria and the LRC Dictatorship Conspiracy


Rumours of Abduction and Assassination Plans by Carlton Essong in Y’DE.



Assassination and Abduction Dossier Opened on the Right Rev Dr Andrew F. Nkea, Bishop of the Catholic Diocese of Mamfe - Cameroon. 

Creditable information filtering from the high Command in Cameroon indicates that the Military Colonel in Mamfe and Senior Divisional Officer of Manyu in the South West Region of Cameroon have initiated and submitted a dossier on the Bishop of Mamfe - the Right Rev Bishop Andrew F Nkea. This dossier has reached the high office of the demonic President Biya who has seen clergy and religious leaders as thorns in their ucurltic practices. But Bishop Andrew Nkea’s troubles are more to do with the Southern Cameroons (Ambazonia) seperationists crisis. The Bishop among others had been dragged to court by the government of Cameroons agents claiming to be a consortium of parents whose children attended lay and religious institutions schools and colleges which were closed due to schools boycott in early 2017. The boycottof schools had been ordered by the Southern Cameroons freedom Movement and the Bishop is said to have told a high powered meeting in Mamfe that the doors to their schools are opened but he can’t force parents to bring their children to school. He even asked the Mayor of Mamfe to bring his child to school the next day and see if the doors wouldn’t be opened for the child. The government of Paul Biya have not taken it lightly. 
Of late; and based on information reaching us from those close to the High Command in Yaoundé on condition of anonymity, the Bishop’s show of Godliness to the victims of the military incursion and atrocities in his Diocese has not been taken kindly by the Military and the Biya’s insiders. 
The Dossier or file which has finally landed on President Biya’s table, cites the Bishop’s interview on BBC, Pastoral Letter and photos following the killings and burning of homes and houses in Kembong; which is one or the larges villages in Central Edjagham in Eyomojock Sub Division. They equally raised alarm to the Bishop’s visit to the refugees in Nigeria where he brought them widow’s might of food and supplies in the refugee camps and narrated their conditions to the media. 
Other sources close to the Roman Catholic Church in Cameroon indicate that the Apostolic Nuncio in Yaoundé and the Vatican have been briefed about Bishop Nkea’s safety especially now that the Vatican has remained silent about the massacre and refugee situation in what is now claimed as Southern Cameroons or Ambazonia. Would the Bishop of Mamfe be treated like Bishop Albert Ndongo of Nkongsamba by the Ahidjo and French regimes or will he be the next clergy to disappear or die of unexplainable causes? 

To be continued! 

Carlton Essong in Y’DE.

OUR FIRM WARNING
If another Bishop disappears again in the hands of this regime, it should be sure they will not know peace in 2018. Neither the people nor the Church is responsible for the untold evil perpetrated by the LRC government. *(Blogger)

Paul Biya and the art of elevating Sisiku AyukTabe by Seasoned Journalist Eli Smith




Paul Biya and the art of elevating Sisiku AyukTabe 

Do not despair. It is what one young man told me this morning and then he added curiously: "we are winning". What are you winning? I retorted, to which he calmly whispered:"Our restoration". Then I moved from my neighborhood to another one and ran into a group of Anglophone Cameroonians. They were conversing and one identified me and asked: "have you heard the news?" I replied: I suppose it is about the arrest of AyukTabe". He nodded affirmatively and told me: "learn to call him President AyukTabe". Then he said: "They have just made matters worst like they did with the consortium".

As I left them and boarded a taxi for Akwa, I felt that, the youngman was correct. And before I could settle at the French cultural centre, I got a phone call from a friend who sounded defiant: "Good things don't come by easily". And she added: "Those people who were on the fence must now understand that Biya thinks his dialogue is long overdue". She concluded: "soon we will have a country where peace will reign and it will be one of the most prosperous". 

Confused, I asked: "are you talking about this Cameroon?" She cried: "No! I am talking about Ambazonia". I didn't continue any further, I understood that what has happened in Nigeria is a kind of divine intervention to salvage this struggle from calapse. 

Paul Biya has by default helped give a revolutionary creditial to AyukTabe. In the underworld, you become, a leader not only after having murdered an innocent person, but after going to jail. In politics, especially that which has to do with fighting against despots, it's synonymous gangster acts. 

If you have not been arrested , harassed or go to jail, you are not respected. It was based on this background that, some people were contesting the leadership of AyukTabe. However, thanks to the maladroit gesture of Abuja and most importantly, Paul Biya, AyukTabe has crushed any revolt. 

He will come out of custody with a new tag: arrested abroad. Sisiku AyukTabe can say thank you to Paul Biya, but he has always been an ally of Anglophone nationalists. In 1984, he used his pen to create Fon Gorgi Dinka and now through his gauche act , he has put fuel in the tanks of restoration movements and more, Unite them. 

If after reading the above you still have doubts that Paul Biya is an ally, albeit by default to the Ambazonian course, then I don't what else to say or write in order to to convince you.


Seasoned Journalist Eli Smith

THE SOUTHERN CAMEROONS SAGA -[ “A STORM IN A TEA CUP ?”] by Mola Njoh Litumbe




THE SOUTHERN CAMEROONS SAGA -[ “A STORM IN A TEA CUP ?”]

Late on Thursday night Dec. 21, 2017 I was alerted by telephone that the Secretary-General of the British Commonwealth of Nations, the Rt Hon Patricia Scotland QC, was in Yaounde for consultations with President Paul Biya of La Republique du Cameroun on the deteriorating situation in Southern Cameroons that has resulted in the massacre of unarmed Southern Cameroonian citizens by lethally armed troops on official orders of the Cameroun Govt. The information stated further that Secretary Scotland had agreed with President Biya to pay a day’s visit on Friday 22nd December 2017 to Buea in Southern Cameroons and would grant audience to traditional rulers at the Municipal premises, and to other personalities at the Buea Mountain Hotel as from 2.15pm. I therefore organized myself to arrive at the Mountain Hotel by 2.0pm.
When I was driving past the Consulate-General of the Federal Republique of Nigeria, my car was stopped by a menacing contingent of the Police Force who prevented me from proceeding further without tendering to them a formal invitation that I was to be received by Secretary Scotland. They all knew who I was, so I thought this was a deliberate attempt to prevent me from talking to Secretary Scotland. I then abandoned my car to them, and decided to walk to the Mountain Hotel where I went through all the security checks and then asked to be taken to Secretary Scotland’s protocol officer to register my presence. He then escorted me to wait in the office of the Hotel’s director and said I should wait there until Secretary Scotland was ready to receive me.
I became uneasy when I was not called for several hours and went out to enquire as to what was happening. I was then asked to wait in the Hotel’s board room, only for another protocol officer to visit and inform me past 5.0pm that Secretary Scotland had already left for Yaounde and that I could also go home.  
What follows is a an outline of the presentation I was to make orally to Secretary Scotland. My views on the subject matter are already well-known and that is why I was prevented by trickery from meeting the Rt Hon. Patricia Scotland.

STORM IN A TEA CUP
Over the past 12 months, or so, serious political differences have arisen between the former UN trust territories of French Cameroun that France granted “independence” on 1st January 1960 by the baptismal name of La Republique du Cameroun, with the former UN trust territory of British Southern Cameroons which the UN General Assembly fixed its date of Independence to be 1st Oct. 1961. 
After the second World War, the victors assembled in the city of San Francisco in the United States of America and, in order to save mankind from the scourge of a 3rd War, the previous war having ended only after the destruction of some 20 million human lives worldwide, and the use of the atomic bomb over Japan, it was felt that the world should be guided by the Rule of Law and Order to prevent a repeat of similar events which triggered the 2nd world war, and to control worldwide the use of atomic or similar military weaponry.
This is what prompted the Drafting and Signing of a Constitution for the World, known as the CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS, managed by six operating Organs which are: 
 (a) The Security Council, (the equivalence of a Board of Directors of any corporation)
 (b) The General Assembly (the equivalence of the supreme shareholders meeting in                                   
       any corporation)
 (c) The Secretariat, (headed by a Secretary-General as Chief Executive Officer)
 (d) The International Court of Justice (to settle disputes between member states of       
                   the UN)
 (e) UNESCO, and
 (f) The Trusteeship Council (to enter into Agreements on behalf of the UN with
                   sovereign Member states to foster Non-independent UN territories to 
                  independence)   
       
 
As the 2nd WW was triggered principally by the expansionist ambitions of Herr Adolf Hitler of Nazi Germany who took delight in annexing smaller and weaker states, the UN Charter provided for this contingency in its Charter, Art. 102, which states thus:
“Art 102(1) Every treaty and every international agreement entered into by any Member of the United Nations after the present Charter comes into force shall, as soon as possible, be registered with the [UN] Secretariat and published by it.
 (2) No party to any such treaty or international agreement which has not been registered in accordance with provisions of paragraph 1 of this Article may invoke that treaty or agreement before any organ of the United Nations.”

On 14 December, 1960 the UN General Assembly, as the supreme operating Organ of the UN, passed the landmark Res. 1514(xv), granting Unconditional Independence to all trust and colonial territories.  
At the material time Southern Cameroons was a UN trust territory and thus became a qualified candidate for Unconditional Independence.

The Resolution. provided expressly in para 5 that “immediate steps shall be taken in trust and non-self governing territories, to transfer powers to the peoples of those territories.”    
Therefore, for a colonial or trust territory to graduate to or attain independence from its trusteeship or colonial status, the Trustee or Colonial Authority had to transfer power over the territory from itself to the emerging independent territory.     

The dispute between the two Cameroon parties has arisen because UN General Assembly Res. 1608(xv) of 21st April 1961, fixing the date of 1st October 1961 as the date the British trust mandate over Southern Cameroons was to end, was never complied with, as there is no record of the transfer of power from Britain, as UN Trustee over Southern Cameroons to the indigenous Govt of Southern Cameroons, pursuant to the governing UN General Assembly Res. 1514(xv) s.5 mentioned above. It follows, therefore, that the People of Southern Cameroons did not graduate to independence from Trustee Britain, and therefore remain technically British protected persons until granted independence, so as to be in a position to negotiate a Union Treaty with La Republique du Cameroun to create a Federation of TWO states, EQUAL in status, as declared by the President of La Republique du Cameroun as to what he envisaged would be the terms of the proposed Union (see Exh. 10 at p. 29 of the attached 32-page Petition of the People of S. Cameroons to the UN General Assembly which was reported not received at the UN Secretariat although sent by DHL courier service from Cameroon).

You should please advise HM the Queen, Head of the British Commonwealth, that in the absence of Britain not being in possession of an Instrument transferring power over the UN trust territory of Southern Cameroons, that country did not attain independence and technically remains a British protectorate. The remedy is the cure prescribed in Art. 102(1) which requires the Union Treaty to be registered at the UN Secretariat “as soon as possible.” If this has not been done before now, HM Government should proceed to respect UN General Assembly Res. 1608(xv) which she voted for with an overwhelming majority of 65 other nations of the world, in an attempt to regularize the union. In the light of practical experience gained over the past half-century, it is my considered view that this may no longer be feasible, and in the interest of peace and security, the parties should be encouraged to go their separate ways.

Humbly submitted

Mola NJOH LITUMBE

Snr Citizen, Politician & Opinion Leader
Chairman of a Legalized Political Party
Holder of Southern Cameroons Corner Stone Award 
       by Southern Cameroonians USA
Washington DC, September 2nd, 2017.

EXHIBIT 10 P29.
ASSURANCES GIVEN BY REPLUBLIQUE DU CAMEROUN’S PRESIDENT AHMADOU AHIDJO, AFFIRMING THAT LA REPLUBLIQUE DU CAMEROUN WILL NOT CONTEMPLATE ANNEXING SOUTHERN CAMEROONS.
In 1959, some perceptive minds in the Trusteeship Council expressed concerns that after attaining independence in 1 January 1960, Republique du Cameroun could try to annex the Southern Cameroons. The Premier of French Cameroun, Mr. Ahidjo, denied any such intension or the possibility of any such action on the part of independent Republique du Cameroun.
At the 849th meeting of the Fourth Committee of the UN, Mr. Ahidjo took the floor and gave the UN the solemn assurance that Republique du Cameroun is not annexationist. He declared:
“We are not annexationist….. If our brothers of the British zone wish to unite with independent Cameroun, we are ready to discuss the matter with them, but we will do so on a footing of equality.”
In June 1960, he told the “Agence Presse Cameroun
“I have said and repeated, in the name of the Government [of Republique du Cameroun], that we do not have any annexationist design.”
In July the same year he again reassured the international community through the same press:
“For us, there can be no question of annexation of the Southern Cameroons. We have envisaged a flexible form of union, a federal form.”
(Above 3 paragraphs culled from Merits stage in Communication 266/2003 before the ACHPR Banju)
Attention is drawn to Art. 47(1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Cameroon (Law No. 24/61 unilaterally enacted by La Republique du Cameroun on 1st September, 1961). 
“Revision
Art. 47(1) Any proposal for the revision of the present Constitution which impairs the unity and integrity of the Federation shall be inadmissible”.

As pointed out elsewhere, Law No. 24/61 merely changed the name of La Republique du Cameroun to La Republique Federal du Cameroun as no Federation was in fact created. By a clever but fraudulent maneuver, this clause was inserted to lure Southern Cameroonians into believing that a Federation had been permanently created and that the federal status was unchangeable. Future events were to show that La Republique du Cameroun was acting in extreme bad faith.

Thursday, November 9, 2017

Top UN Official Confirms A Possible Independent Southern Cameroons
By Eric Tataw for National Telegraph, USA

A long-serving UN official has confided in National Telegraph that Southern Cameroons has the right to be an Independent Country. While insisting we withhold his identity, the diplomat however hinted that procedures must be followed. He explained to National Telegraph's Editor-in-chief, Eric Tataw that Southern Cameroons must follow the Montevideo Convention. He went on that as at now, Southern Cameroons is already on track with this Convention adopted in 1933 on the Rights and Duties of States.
He further told National Telegraph that the Convention requires Southern Cameroons must declare it's intentions which she did on October 1, 2017. He however added that a referendum is imperative. Our interviewee again remarked that according to the Convention, the seceding country must belong within clearly defined boundaries with a permanent population, this to him, Southern Cameroons already has.
Another remarkable revelation is that as country wishing to secede, Southern Cameroons must have a government as he cites the Southern Cameroons Interim Government as a commendable step. He however added that such a government must canvass for friendship and get into relationship with other sovereign states so that each recognizes her at their discretion.
Our source stated firmly that Southern Cameroons has all it takes from the authenticity of its History, Maps and Boundaries to secede from the Republic of Cameroon. He however noted that the UN doesn't have the authority to recognize a state while highlighting that Southern Cameroons must start the process itself by first and foremost sending to the UN an application letter plus a declaration showing will to respect the UN Charter.
He further told National Telegraph that the application letter and declaration will be followed by a review of the Security Council before the 193 members of the General Assembly would vote with a two-thirds majority for Southern Cameroons to be admitted and recognized.
He then cornered National Telegraph that reports from Amnesty International and other media reports on a somewhat Genocide going on in the area, number of detainees, the Refugee situation as shown by Nigerian authorities and reports of militarization, amongst others are exactly like the case of South Sudan before she gained Independence from Sudan on July 9, 2011.
He ended that Southern Cameroons has a fine and perfect case but must follow procedure and Independence will follow, adding that Southern Cameroons residents have a great role to show resistance to continuously echo their case to the UN and other countries as a people who want sovereignty. 

Monday, October 30, 2017

The Biya Regime: Inciting Civil War, Perpetrating Genocide, Terrorism and Repression by Mbiydzenyuy David WANTANGWA


"The only way by which the LRC dictatorship of this man, Paul Biya, can continue to wrangle and make the noise of a "one and indivisible" country over which they have imposed their rule, is to show a legal document, to the satisfaction of the United Nations and other World bodies and above all, to the people of Southern Cameroons, that binds them to his tyrannical regime. Otherwise, all their grip over the people is intrusive, illegal and unrecognized. You cannot perpetrate the reign of terror on a people over whom you illegally impose yourselves with the complicity of a good number of players in and out of Cameroon. The time of reckoning is now. Prove your legality over the people first. We do not need to belabour the point that there is no legal document showing that Cameroon was ever or is one and indivisible as you are wont to quickly yell."

The Biya Regime: Inciting Civil War, Perpetrating Genocide, Terrorism and Repression by
Mbiydzenyuy David WANTANGWA
“if you keep silence in the face of aggression, then you have chosen the side of the oppressor”. (Desmond Tutu) and “it is a sin to be silent when it is your duty to protest” (Abraham Lincoln).
Introduction to Reality
The manipulative divide-and-rule strategies of the LRC government, shepherded by its leader, the dictator, Paul Biya, spearheaded by some of his government ministers, thugs and elites and executed by their brutal military, and skillfully teleguided by France, their colonial master, had no other purpose than to breed civil war, incite hate and division between the Francophones and the citizens of Southern Cameroons. Unfortunately, they have met with the most intelligent, resolute, and unpredictably strategic handling of the crisis by the leaders of Southern Cameroons in spite of their own shortcomings. The attitude of the LRC government is reminiscent of an evasive regime that has only one tool, called the HAMMER, (repressive criminals in the name of military), and so they force every problem to resemble a nail so as to fit with their sole tool, to hammer it and force themselves on the people. “If you have to win by dividing people, you won’t be able to govern them” said Barack Obama. Legitimacy over a people is merited and sanctioned by constructive democratic management of crises and not my imposing its inadequate, archaic, barbaric, albeit, mediocre, obnoxious solutions on the people. Again, “indigenous people have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right, they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development”. (United Nations). This is the reality the LRC government will have to face and the hard knot they will have to come to terms with and swallow.
The LRC regime’s handling of what is now popularly called “the anglophone problem” which smacks of a very high magnitude of incompetence, butchery, rapine, or in other words uncontrolled military repression, has led to a lot of reflection and background action on both sides and we publish a series of articles relating to the true aims underlying the regime’s intentions behind this form of archaic tyranny in the 21st century.
Here we are! faced with a murderous regime that will not hesitate to kill anyone who differs with their agenda in order to have their way to continue the systematic pillage of this fatherland.
Here we are! with a veritably lying, manipulative and Machiavellian leadership that possesses the evil skills of divide and rule politics, corruption of the masses, disruption of the genuine rule of law and whimsical administration of state affairs.
Here we are! faced with a completely “deviant regime, that rules only with a view to personal advantage”. In our earlier Open Letter to the President and to the Episcopal Conference of the Bishops of Cameroon (you can read the letter in its entirety in, www.ambassbay.blogspot.com/...) we exposed some details about this regime which have in the course of these months proven to be undoubtedly true. The claim of the regime over the people of Southern Cameroons has become clearly illegitimate as the people have unanimously rejected the Yaoundé dictatorship which is presently still forcing itself upon them.
Here we are! faced with a group of selfish and uncontrollably greedy fellows who would not hesitate to perform any kind of mean, debasing and inhumane job before their dictator who tosses them around like puppets.
Here we are! with faced with a heap of mediocre administrators who impose their mediocrity upon the masses having sent the whole country and its resources and projects down the drain without any remorse because they glory in keeping the masses in the dark.
Here we are! faced with a bunch of deviant and morally debased criminals who have committed all sorts of crimes against their people, from controversial killings, to corruption, embezzlement, and what have you. The sad list can go on and on.
Here we are! faced with a regime for whom bloodshed is the order of the day, in order to have their way, intimidation, murder and controversy. A regime steeped in the blood of its own very citizens, whom they are supposed to protect. A regime that thrives in evil and wanton disregard for basic inalienable human rights.
Here we are! Face to face with the LRC dictatorship, a bunch of blood thirsty criminals who have sold out their consciences to the devil and clinging tenaciously and desperately to power as if that were the only thing, the only option in life left for them. Power, they say, corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Here we are! face to face with a regime specialized in all sorts of hideous crimes against humanity, backed up a terrible magnitude of lies, coercive techniques, elimination of political opponents under cover of law. After all, they are successively specialized in twisting and bending the law every time according to their secret agendas and whims and caprices especially when they foresee that they will be entrapped by the law. And therefore, this makes of their laws, constitutions, decrees, injunctions etc., a set of Napoleonic codes, capable of changing at any time and which become ridiculous to follow, making a total mockery of the judicial system.
The Language of War, Hate, Terrorism and Violence
We begin this writeup with the following from the Parliamentarian, Joseph Wirba, “IN SHOCK AND IN TEARS!! MY DEAR PEOPLE OF WEST CAMEROON, they are killing our people again! When I tell you, these people do not believe we have blood, some don't believe me. Look at carnage out here! These people will eliminate us if we don't rise up like one man and stop them! They hate us, they spite us, they will "take us out" if they have their chance! We must stop them Now! It is time to take our Peaceful Resistance to a higher level. It is time to let our oppressors know that we have had enough of killing, jailing and maiming of our people!! This Commander in Bui has been known for his contemptuous treatment of our people! He is known for saying that his orders come from the presidency in Yaoundé, and for referring to our people as 'les chiens Anglophone', meaning; 'Anglophone dogs'! Are we surprised he just killed some 'dogs'? My people, our resolve and our preparedness must be strong! Get ready for the second phase of our resistance movement. We must stand up to oppression and we must defeat oppression!!! PLEASE SHARE THIS TO THE WORLD! Hon WIRBA Joseph, signed and sealed with the blood of our fallen heroes”.
Remember, that one ethnic group insisted and called the other “cockroaches” in Rwanda and this led to the Rwandan Genocide – the most gruesome in modern history, the scar from which Rwanda will never recover, no matter the type and quality of solutions offered. I wonder if that illiterate of a Commander in Bui, has ever availed himself the opportunity of knowing that gruesome scenario from which a people has never risen nor been genuinely reconciled. Genuine peace is priceless.
The Regime thugs, protagonists and evil apostles have deliberately refused to represent the situation in its objective reality. And this is how genocide and war begin. To show either their unwillingness to tackle the real problems of the people, they have continuously and stubbornly insisted that it is a language problem, and rather attempting by all means to incite the Francophones against the Southern Cameroonians, that it is a Francophone – Anglophone problem in order to denote that Anglophones hate Francophones and have indoctrinated and incited some weak minded French Cameroonians to react. Some francophones, either out of ignorance, as usual, or blind obedience of the useless system in place, have taken upon themselves to rise up against Southern Cameroonians even without understanding why, or what the problem of the Southern Cameroons is. What would be the result if either the Francophones or the Anglophones subscribe to such an evil label – of course, civil war and to whose interest, that of these leaders who would possessing foreign nationalities, would safely escape into their safe havens in Europe and America and elsewhere in the world.
Here we shall not hesitate, to identify individuals who have used divisive, and hate language that normally brings civil war, hate, terrorism and Violence. The LRC President Paul Biya, on the 31st of December 2016, referred to the Anglophones as “extremist”. To have labelled a people whose educational and legal systems, the French speaking citizens including himself envy, is uncalled for, and it only indicates his intensions when he nursed a genocide in his official utterance. We often say in English give a dog a bad and hang it. This probably should justify his tyrannical handling of the crisis by using military action to repress peaceful protesters.
The Governor of the South West Region, Okalia Bilai has on various occasions used the following words, he first referred to Anglophones as “boko haram” and later on as “dogs”. The same hate language like his master. Mr. Issa Tchiroma Bakary, the LRC Minister of Communication, has on several occasions referred to Anglophones using the following terms, “secessionists”, “extremists”, “terrorists” and more than enough public evidence exists with videos of their various utterances. Among a myriad of press conferences, he has offered to explain the government position, is worth mentioning, the heart-rending lies, he publicly and shamelessly rambled and mumbled in a confusive language he calls English and full of extreme lies and conscious distortion of reality purposefully geared at misleading international and national opinion. This was after the butchery and mayhem of the 22nd of September 2017 and especially, the 1st of October 2017. He dared to praise the brutality of the bestial army of repression they sent into Southern Cameroons. Be they reminded, that such language is against international law, and that as Southern Cameroonians have insisted and continue to insist, they are a peace-loving people. This same LRC government spokesperson, has been insistently talking of some imaginary group of “secessionists” “armed with machetes and bombs” and in an open press conference declared that LRC had killed some of the secessionist fighters. For Minister Issa Tchiroma, to openly prefer and quote the complacent letter of the President of the Episcopal Conference as against the factual and frank declaration of the Bishops of Southern Cameroons whom he shamelessly accused of taking sides with “terrorists”, is to publicly attempt to sow division in the church, which makes of him a veritable advocate of the devil and a dishonest “divide and rule” strategies of the LRC government. Abundant evidence abounds, that lots of lives lost in Southern Cameroons were those of harmless and unarmed civilians who carried peace plants matching and shouting, “no violence” to which the blood-thirsty military did not heed. The profile of those killed does not in any way resemble fighters but of peaceful protesters. It has been characteristic of LRC government to frame up the anglophones, accusing them of arson, but it is clear that the military of LRC is responsible for organizing and carrying out these acts of arson, burning of Sacred Heart College Mankon and the frame-up of arms being discovered in Mbengwi. Only the LRC government can prove these allegations which accordingly are geared towards justifying their repressive acts on the people of Southern Cameroons. The language of terrorism, and others has only initiated from their lips.
The Military as their Instrument of Inciting Civil War and Genocide
To further justify their actions, they have continued to deploy military to perpetrate acts of arson, killings, genocide, rape, torture and kidnaps. The social media is rife with videos of police and military acts of atrocities, torture, killings and maltreatment of the people of Southern Cameroons. The military has always been used by the regime to perpetrate and crack down on the people as its torture and repressive mechanism to suppress the people when they want to express their rights to disagree with the regime. They have manipulated the media, repressed the media and issued orders limiting media reporting. They have continuously interrupted the internet in order that the world should not see the terrible atrocities and genocide being carried out by the police and the military.
The Responsibility of Britain and France
During the recent European Union meeting, the accusation by the German minister upon France and Britain for being responsible for this mess is well justified. Unfortunately, France cannot come in to fight civilians and that is the reason why they keep a conspicuous silence. They are to be held responsible for this mess happening in Southern Cameroons and they keep silence as if that is none of their concerns. Therefore, they have that moral and socio-political responsibility to return in all honesty to restore what they left undone. Their sadistic silence has been very preoccupying.
Other Voices Worth Mentioning
The United nations has cautioned the LRC government over its atrocities over its own people. The insane dictator of Cameroon as usual has not said a word, let alone respond to the many voices calling him to order. The African Union has spoken. The Francophonie probably out of shame, has spoken and other internationally reliable organisations. REDAC (spelling) has written. The Bishops of the Bamenda Ecclesiastical Province have written and now we are writing. The intransigence of the LRC government is very disturbing both in the national and international scenes given the fact that they are signatories to very important and law-abiding treaties and conventions that they have just ruptured in their endless repression over the people of Southern Cameroons. The insane dictator, Paul Biya, carefully teleguided by France, remains unperturbed in Switzerland ruling his country at a delicate time like this, from a distance as usual. The people as well as other well – intentioned opinions cannot keep quiet and watch this genocide over a peaceful, unarmed people and this massive bias and repression which the government is unduly exercising over them.
Manipulating the Press to Propagate this Violence and Hate Culture
The government of LRC is using outmoded, ancient, and tyrannical methods in this 21st century to repress a people who are assuming their self-determination. They are not just oppressing the people of southern Cameroons, but repressing other media organs not to expose the truth. They have been exposed beyond measure because in spite of the internet shut-down with the complicity of the telecommunications operators, gruesome images have been published and so they cannot cover their crimes enough and so that is why the government spokesperson, Issa Tchiroma can shamelessly lie and praise the hideous crimes committed by the LRC regime on the very citizens they are meant to protect. Needless, to mention that they have lost legitimacy over the people of Southern Cameroons and instead of looking for a solution to genuinely discuss the form of the state that the people want, they still continue to manipulate the press, and impress themselves upon the people who have rejected them.
Where are the Corpses of the Dead LRC?
It is reliably documented, that the LRC military killed and evacuated the dead bodies of those whom they killed, some through helicopter gun fire. Since 2016, when allegations of mass graves were rife in Cameroon, the LRC government kept a conspicuous silence. Some of those released from the prison in Kondengui reliably informed us of recorded deaths amongst those ferried by them to Yaoundé prison. The LRC government has still kept silent, not releasing everyone they captured probably to give false hope to the remaining families that their sons could be alive. The only aim they evacuated the dead bodies of those killed was to cover, alter and wipe out the evidence that they killed. It is clear, and we stand to be contradicted, that the LRC government cannot give a complete and genuine account of those missing due to their military atrocities and murder committed on unarmed people of Southern Cameroons. The blood of human beings is not the blood of animals and so the LRC government is presently being charged for killing and hiding the corpses of those they killed and they will be haunted by the dead. Again, a local Newspaper, published an article, “Midnight burial uncovered in Mile 16 Buea. Allegations are rife, of people having been arrested from Southern Cameroons and carried in helicopters and dropped in foreign territories and regions of the North of Cameroon, so that their dead bodies will never be discovered. The basic question to the LRC government still remains, where are the dead bodies of all those who were arrested, tortured and killed by your military bandits? Can the LRC government ever give a full account of such hideous crimes against its own citizens or can they ever hope to repair the damage and the rupture they have caused to the Cameroonian nation especially the territory of the Southern Cameroons? If the findings of the UNHCR and other international bodies and media organs proves these stories and allegations, right what will the lying miserable slave of the LRC government, the communication minister and spokesperson of the government say? Again, if the allegations of Cameroon having used mercenaries from the Chadian Army proves right, what will they say? Then they are in for a good deal with the people of Southern Cameroons who will never again have anything to do with this evil regime. Did we say that the former government spokesperson lied (the famous “zero mort”), the present spokesperson to say the least, seems to have been mandated by Lucifer himself to consciously derail public and international opinion about the ugly realities of the rubbish they call country?
Stop the Frame-Ups of Arms and Terrorism
It should be clear to any blind eye, that the killings of the Gendarmes, and other military people, the false allegations of having arrested some terrorists as separatists, the allegations of having retrieved arms, den guns, lances, in fact household articles in the names of having seized arms, like they did in Mbengwi are a continuous frame-up from the LRC government. It is ridiculous when you see both the profile of those they claim are terrorists, those arms they claim to have seized. All of these are clearly leading to what they know best, military force and we have gone passed that stage. We have to show our temerity in our decision and non-involvement in arms yet this does not mean that we have lost our right to self-defence. Therefore, the AGC and the ADF claims should have a total rethink since the evidence on the ground is rather showing LRC frame-ups.
God is God, and God will still be God. “No Shaking” as our common folks will say. Our target is BUEA and no one will distract us from it.
Mbiydzenyuy David WANTANGWA